Discrimination Crypticity and Incipient Taxa in Entamoeba

摘要

Persistent difficulties in resolving clear lineages in diverging populations of prokaryotes or unicellular eukaryotes (protistan polyphyletic groups) are challenging the classical species concept. Although multiple integrated approaches would render holistic taxonomies, most phylogenetic studies are still based on single-gene or morphological traits. Such methodologies conceal natural lineages, which are considered ‘cryptic’. The concept of species is considered artificial and inadequate to define natural populations. Social organisms display differential behaviors toward kin than to non-related individuals. In ‘social’ microbes, kin discrimination has been used to help resolve crypticity. Aggregative behavior could be explored in a non-social protist to define phylogenetic varieties that are considered ‘cryptic’. Two Entamoeba invadens strains, VK-1:NS and IP-1 are considered close populations of the same ‘species’. This study demonstrates that VK-1:NS and IP-1 trophozoites aggregate only with alike members and discriminate individuals from different strains based on behavioral and chemical signals. Combined morphological, behavioral/chemical and ecological studies could improve Archamoebae phylogenies and define cryptic varieties. Evolutionary processes in which selection acted continuously and cumulatively on ancestors of Entamoeba populations gave rise to behavioral and chemical signals that allowed individuals to discriminate non-population members and gradually, to new lineages; alternative views that claim a ‘Designer’ or ‘Creator’ as responsible for protistan diversity are unfounded.