首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Death and the dead-house in Victorian asylums: necroscopy versus mourning at the Royal Edinburgh Asylum c. 1832–1901
【2h】

Death and the dead-house in Victorian asylums: necroscopy versus mourning at the Royal Edinburgh Asylum c. 1832–1901

机译:维多利亚时代的死亡和死屋:核心科学与皇家爱丁堡庇护c。 1832-1901

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article examines the management and meaning of post-mortem examinations, and the spatial ordering of patients’ death, dissection and burial at the Victorian asylum, referencing a range of institutional contexts and exploiting a case study of the Royal Edinburgh Asylum. The routinizing of dissection and the development of the dead-house from a more marginal asylum sector to a lynchpin of laboratory medicine is stressed. External and internal pressure to modernize pathological research facilities is assessed alongside governmental, public and professional critiques of variable necroscopy practices. This is contextualized against wider issues and attitudes surrounding consent and funereal rituals. Onus is placed on tendencies in anatomizing insanity towards the conversion of deceased lunatics – pauper lunatics especially – into mere pathological specimens. On the other hand, significant but compromised resistance on the part of a minority of practitioners, relatives and the wider public is also identified.
机译:本文介绍了验尸后检查的管理和意义,以及维多利亚庇护所患者死亡,解剖和埋葬的空间排序,参考了一系列制度背景和利用皇家爱丁堡庇护的案例研究。压缩了解剖的常规和从更边缘的庇护部门到实验室药物的一个常规庇护部门的发展。对现代化的外部和内部压力进行了现代化的病理学研究设施,并与可变性剖视实践的政府,公共和专业批评进行了评估。这是针对更广泛的问题和周边同意和态势仪式的态度的上下文。 Onus倾向于解剖疯狂术语术语,以促进死亡的疯子转化 - 贫民部门,尤其是仅为病理标本。另一方面,还确定了少数从业者,亲属和更广泛的公众的重要而受损的抵抗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号