首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Atrial Fibrillation at an Internal Medicine Ward: Clinical and Prognostic Implications
【2h】

Atrial Fibrillation at an Internal Medicine Ward: Clinical and Prognostic Implications

机译:内科病房的心房颤动:临床和预后意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Little is known about atrial fibrillation (AF) appearing during hospitalization in an Internal Medicine ward. >Purpose: We aimed to investigate characteristics and prognostic significance of in-hospital onset AF. >Methods: We studied 249 consecutive unselected patients admitted to this medical department with paroxysmal or persistent AF (out-of-hospital group) or AF developed during hospitalization (in-hospital group). Demographic, clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data and all-cause mortality following discharge were recorded and compared between the groups >Results: Diabetes mellitus (p=0.05), renal dysfunction (p<0.001), chronic lung disease (p=0.03) and history of stroke (p=0.01) were found more common in the in-hospital group (56 patients), compared to the out-of-hospital group (193 patients). Patients from the in-hospital group were more likely to have recurrent episodes of AF during hospitalization (p=0.002), were more frequently treated with amiodarone (p<0.001), discharged in sinus rhythm (p=0.04) and with medications for rhythm control (p=0.04). Time from onset to termination of AF (p<0.001) and hospital stay (p<0.001) were longer in the in-hospital group. On a median of 39-months follow-up, survival rate was lower in the in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital group (69.6% vs. 81.3%, p=0.025). Older age was significantly associated with shorter survival in the in-hospital group [odds ratio (OR)=1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15−3.03, p=0.009]. In the out-of-hospital group, advanced age (OR=2.17, 95%CI 1.51−3.10, p<0.001), no prior AF episode (OR=3.41, 95%CI 1.56−7.46, p=0.002), diabetes mellitus (OR=2.22, 95%CI 1.12−4.39, p=0.006) and renal dysfunction (OR=2.44, 95%CI 1.10−5.38, p=0.049) were significantly associated with shorter survival. >Conclusion: Patients developing in-hospital AF differed from subjects hospitalized for AF with respect to the severity of the clinical profile and prognosis.
机译:>背景:很少是众所周知的内科病房住院期间出现的心房颤动(AF)。 <强>目的:我们旨在调查医院内发作AF的特征和预后意义。 >方法:我们研究了249名与阵发性或持久性AF(医院外组)或AF在住院期间开发的阵发性或持久性AF(医院组)的AF的连续未选择的患者。记录并比较在排出后的人口统计学,临床,实验室,心电图和超声心动图和全因死亡率,并比较群体<强>结果:糖尿病(P = 0.05),肾功能紊乱(P <0.001),慢性与医院外组(193名患者)相比,在医院组(56名患者)中发现肺病(P = 0.03)和中风历史(P = 0.01)。来自医院内的患者更容易在住院期间具有复发性AF的发作(p = 0.002),更频繁地用胺碘酮(p <0.001)处理,以窦性心律(p = 0.04)排出并用药物治疗节奏控制(P = 0.04)。从发病到AF(P <0.001)和住院住宿(P <0.001)的时间较长,在医院内部较长。在39个月后续随访中,医院内与医院外的存活率降低(69.6%,vs.8.3%,P = 0.025)。较旧的年龄明显与在医院内部的存活率短(或)= 1.87,95%置信区间(CI)1.15-3.03,P = 0.009]。在医院外组,高龄(或= 2.17,95%CI 1.51-3.10,P <0.001),没有先前的AF集(或= 3.41,95%CI 1.56-7.46,P = 0.002),糖尿病MELLITUS(或= 2.22,95%CI 1.12-4.39,P = 0.006)和肾功能紊乱(或= 2.44,95%CI 1.10-5.38,P = 0.049)显着与较短的存活相关。 >结论:患者在医院AF开发的患者与临床剖面和预后的严重程度住院治疗的受试者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号