首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Inter-Subject Correlation in fMRI: Method Validation against Stimulus-Model Based Analysis
【2h】

Inter-Subject Correlation in fMRI: Method Validation against Stimulus-Model Based Analysis

机译:在功能磁共振成像跨学科的相关性:方法验证免受刺激基于模型的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Within functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the use of the traditional general linear model (GLM) based analysis methods is often restricted to strictly controlled research setups requiring a parametric activation model. Instead, Inter-Subject Correlation (ISC) method is based on voxel-wise correlation between the time series of the subjects, which makes it completely non-parametric and thus suitable for naturalistic stimulus paradigms such as movie watching. In this study, we compared an ISC based analysis results with those of a GLM based in five distinct controlled research setups. We used International Consortium for Brain Mapping functional reference battery (FRB) fMRI data available from the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging image data archive. The selected data included measurements from 37 right-handed subjects, who all had performed the same five tasks from FRB. The GLM was expected to locate activations accurately in FRB data and thus provide good grounds for investigating relationship between ISC and stimulus induced fMRI activation. The statistical maps of ISC and GLM were compared with two measures. The first measure was the Pearson's correlation between the non-thresholded ISC test-statistics and absolute values of the GLM Z-statistics. The average correlation value over five tasks was 0.74. The second was the Dice index between the activation regions of the methods. The average Dice value over the tasks and three threshold levels was 0.73. The results of this study indicated how the data driven ISC analysis found the same foci as the model-based GLM analysis. The agreement of the results is highly interesting, because ISC is applicable in situations where GLM is not suitable, for example, when analyzing data from a naturalistic stimuli experiment.
机译:在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)中,基于传统通用线性模型(GLM)的分析方法的使用通常仅限于需要参数激活模型的严格控制的研究设置。相反,对象间相关性(ISC)方法基于对象时间序列之间的体素相关性,这使其完全非参数化,因此适用于诸如电影观看之类的自然刺激范例。在这项研究中,我们将基于ISC的分析结果与基于GLM的分析结果在五个不同的受控研究设置中进行了比较。我们使用了可从神经影像实验室图像数据档案库获得的国际脑图功能联盟功能参考电池(FRB)fMRI数据。选择的数据包括来自37位右撇子受试者的测量值,这些受试者均执行了FRB的相同五项任务。预期GLM可以在FRB数据中准确定位激活,从而为研究ISC和刺激诱导的fMRI激活之间的关系提供了良好的基础。将ISC和GLM的统计图与两种方法进行比较。第一个度量是非阈值ISC测试统计量与GLM Z统计量绝对值之间的皮尔森相关性。五个任务的平均相关值为0.74。第二个是方法激活区域之间的Dice索引。任务和三个阈值水平上的平均Dice值为0.73。这项研究的结果表明,数据驱动的ISC分析如何发现与基于模型的GLM分析相同的焦点。结果的一致性非常有趣,因为ISC适用于GLM不适合的情况,例如,当分析自然刺激实验的数据时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号