首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Resource Transfers and Evolution: Helpful Offspring and Sex Allocation
【2h】

Resource Transfers and Evolution: Helpful Offspring and Sex Allocation

机译:资源转移与演变:有用的后代和性分配

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In some vertebrates, offspring help their parents produce additional offspring. Often individuals of only one sex become “helpers at the nest”. We analyze how such sex-biased offspring helping can influence sex ratio evolution. It is essential to account for age-structure because the sex ratios of early broods influence how much help is available for later broods; previous authors have not correctly accounted for this fact. When each female produces the same sex ratio in all broods (as assumed in all previous analyses of sex-biased helping), the optimal investment strategy is biased towards the more-helpful sex. When a female has facultative control over the sex ratio in each brood and each helper of a given sex increases the resource available for offspring production by a fixed amount, the optimal strategy is to produce only the more-helpful sex in early broods and only the less-helpful sex in later broods. When there are nonlinear returns from helping, i.e., each helper increases the amount of resource available for reproduction by an amount dependent upon the number of helpers, the optimal strategy is to maximize resource accrual from helping in early broods (which may involve the production of both sexes) and then switch to the exclusive production of the less-helpful sex in later broods. The population sex ratio is biased towards the more helpful sex regardless of whether the sex ratio is fixed or age-dependent. When fitness returns from helping exhibit environmental patchiness, females are selected to produce only males on some patches and only females on others, and the population sex ratio may be biased in either direction. We discuss our results in light of empirical information on offspring helping, and we show via meta-analysis that there is no support for the claim of that parents produce more of the helpful sex when that sex is rare or absent.
机译:在某些脊椎动物中,后代会帮助父母产生更多的后代。通常只有一种性别的人会成为“巢穴的帮手”。我们分析了这种性别偏见的后代如何影响性别比例的演变。考虑年龄结构是至关重要的,因为早期育雏的性别比例会影响为后期育雏提供多少帮助。以前的作者没有正确解释这个事实。当每位女性在所有群体中产生相同的性别比例时(如先前所有有关性别偏见的分析所假设的那样),最佳投资策略偏向于更有益的性别。当雌性对每个育雏中的性别比例具有兼职控制权,并且给定性别的每个助手增加固定数量的后代生产资源时,最佳策略是仅在早期育雏中产生更有益的性别,而只以后的性生活中无助的性行为。当从帮助中获得非线性回报时,即每个帮助者将可用于繁殖的资源数量增加了一定数量,具体取决于帮助者的数量,最佳策略是最大限度地利用早期育雏过程中的资源积累(这可能涉及生产男性和女性),然后转而在后来的育儿中独家生产帮助性较低的性爱。不论性别比例是固定的还是年龄依赖性的,人口性别比例都倾向于更有益的性别。当适应性从帮助显示环境斑块而恢复时,选择雌性只在某些斑块上生产雄性,而在另一些斑块上仅生产雌性,并且人口性别比可能在任何一个方向上存在偏差。我们根据有关后代帮助的经验信息来讨论我们的研究结果,并且通过荟萃分析表明,对于这种父母很少或缺席时父母会产生更多帮助性的说法,我们没有任何支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号