首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Extreme value analyses of VOC exposures and risks: A comparison of RIOPA and NHANES datasets
【2h】

Extreme value analyses of VOC exposures and risks: A comparison of RIOPA and NHANES datasets

机译:VOC风险和风险的极值分析:RIOPA和NHANES数据集的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Extreme value theory, which characterizes the behavior of tails of distributions, is potentially well-suited to model exposures and risks of pollutants. In this application, it emphasizes the highest exposures, particularly those that may be high enough to present acute or chronic health risks. The present study examines extreme value distributions of exposures and risks to volatile organic compounds (VOCs).Exposures of 15 different VOCs were measured in the Relationship between Indoor, Outdoor and Personal Air (RIOPA) study, and ten of the same VOCs were measured in the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Both studies used similar sampling methods and study periods. Using the highest 5 and 10% of measurements, generalized extreme value (GEV), Gumbel and lognormal distributions were fit to each VOC in these two large studies. Health risks were estimated for individual VOCs and three VOC mixtures. Simulated data that matched the three types of distributions were generated and compared to observations to evaluate goodness-of-fit. The tail behavior of exposures, which clearly neither fit normal nor lognormal distributions for most VOCs in RIOPA, was usually best fit by the 3-parameter GEV distribution, and often by the 2-parameter Gumbel distribution. In contrast, lognormal distributions significantly underestimated both the level and likelihood of extrema. Among the RIOPA VOCs, 1,4-dichlorobenzene (1,4-DCB) caused the greatest risks, e.g., for the top 10% extrema, all individuals had risk levels above 10−4, and 13% of them exceeded 10−2. NHANES had considerably higher concentrations of all VOCs with two exceptions, methyl tertiary-butyl ether and 1,4-DCB. Differences between these studies can be explained by sampling design, staging, sample demographics, smoking and occupation.This analysis shows that extreme value distributions can represent peak exposures of VOCs, which clearly are neither normally nor lognormally distributed. These exposures have the greatest health significance, and require accurate modeling.
机译:表征分布尾部行为的极值理论可能非常适合于建模污染物的暴露和风险。在本申请中,它强调最高的暴露水平,尤其是那些可能足以引起急性或慢性健康风险的暴露水平。本研究调查了挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的暴露和风险的极值分布。在室内,室外和个人空气之间的关系(RIOPA)研究中测量了15种不同VOC的暴露,而在室内,室外和个人空气之间的关系中测量了10种相同的VOC。全国代表性的国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)。两项研究均使用类似的抽样方法和研究时间。在这两项大型研究中,使用最高的5%和10%的测量值,对每个VOC拟合了通用极值(GEV),Gumbel和对数正态分布。估计了单个VOC和三种VOC混合物的健康风险。生成了与三种分布类型相匹配的模拟数据,并将其与观察值进行比较以评估拟合优度。对于RIOPA中大多数VOC而言,暴露的尾部行为显然既不符合正态分布也不符合对数正态分布,通常最适合于3参数的GEV分布,而通常是2参数的Gumbel分布。相反,对数正态分布大大低估了极值的水平和可能性。在RIOPA VOC中,1,4-二氯苯(1,4-DCB)引起的风险最大,例如,对于前10%的极值患者,所有个体的风险水平均在10 -4 以上,而13其中%超过10 −2 。 NHANES具有较高的所有VOC浓度,只有两个,甲基叔丁基醚和1,4-DCB。这些研究之间的差异可以通过抽样设计,分期,样本人口统计学,吸烟和职业来解释。该分析表明,极值分布可以代表挥发性有机化合物的峰值暴露,这显然既不是正态分布也不是对数正态分布。这些暴露对健康的影响最大,需要精确的建模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号