首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Capacity building for long-term community-academic health partnership outcomes
【2h】

Capacity building for long-term community-academic health partnership outcomes

机译:长期社区学术健康伙伴关系成果的能力建设

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Too often, populations experiencing the greatest burden of disease and disparities in health outcomes are left out of or ineffectively involved in academic-led efforts to address issues that impact them the most. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an approach increasingly being used to address these issues, but the science of CBPR is still viewed by many as a nascent field. Important to the development of the science of CBPR is documentation of the partnership process, particularly capacity building activities important to establishing the CBPR research infrastructure. This paper uses a CBPR Logic Model as a structure for documenting partnership capacity building activities of a long-term community-academic partnership addressing public health issues in Arkansas, U.S. Illustrative activities, programs, and experiences are described for each of the model’s four constructs: context, group dynamics, interventions, and outcomes. Lessons learned through this process were: capacity building is required by both academic and community partners; shared activities provide a common base of experiences and expectations; and creating a common language facilitates dialogue about difficult issues. Development of community partnerships with one institutional unit promoted community engagement institution-wide, enhanced individual and partnership capacity, and increased opportunity to address priority issues.
机译:通常,遭受最大疾病负担和健康结果差异的人群没有参与或未能有效参与以学术为主导的努力,以解决对他们影响最大的问题。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)是越来越多地用于解决这些问题的方法,但是CBPR的科学仍然被许多人视为新兴领域。对CBPR科学发展至关重要的是伙伴关系过程的文档,尤其是对建立CBPR研究基础设施至关重要的能力建设活动。本文使用CBPR逻辑模型作为结构来记录长期社区-学术伙伴关系的伙伴关系能力建设活动,以解决阿肯色州的公共卫生问题,美国为模型的四个构造分别说明了示例性活动,计划和经验:背景,小组动态,干预措施和结果。通过这一过程获得的经验教训是:学术和社区合作伙伴都需要进行能力建设;共享活动提供了经验和期望的共同基础;并创建一种通用语言有助于就困难问题进行对话。与一个机构单位发展社区伙伴关系,促进了整个机构的社区参与,增强了个人和伙伴关系的能力,并增加了解决优先问题的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号