首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of Medication Practices in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved vs those with Reduced Ejection Fraction (from the Cardiovascular Research Network)
【2h】

Comparison of Medication Practices in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved vs those with Reduced Ejection Fraction (from the Cardiovascular Research Network)

机译:心力衰竭患者用药实践的比较并用射血分数降低的VS血管术(心血管研究网络)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Limited data exist describing differences in the medical management of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) from those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) in more generalizable population-based cohorts. We studied individuals with incident HF diagnosed between 2005 and 2008 from 4 sites participating in the Cardiovascular Research Network. These persons, their medication profile, and left ventricular systolic function status were identified based on hospital discharge and ambulatory visit diagnoses, pharmacy dispensing information, and imaging reports found in health plan electronic databases and through chart review. The study population consisted of 6,210 patients with newly diagnosed HF-PEF and 3,914 patients with newly diagnosed HF-REF. The mean age of our study population was 73 years, 48% were women, and 74% were Caucasian. Patients with HF-REF were less likely to have been treated with various cardiac and HF related medications prior to their index HF event, but were significantly more likely to have been treated with new cardiac medications and HF therapies after the diagnosis of HF, than patients with HF-PEF. After controlling for several potentially confounding factors, patients with HF-PEF were significantly less likely to have been treated with multiple cardiac drug regimens (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.69; 95% CI 0.59, 0.81) and multiple HF related therapies (OR = 0.40; 95% 0.38,0.42) than patients with HF-REF. The present results from a large, population-based sample suggest considerable variation in the prior and new use of different cardiac medication classes of drugs in patients with HF-PEF vs. HF-REF.
机译:有限的数据描述了射血分数保留(HF-PEF)的心力衰竭患者与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者(HF-REF)在更普遍的人群研究中在医疗管理方面的差异。我们对参加心血管研究网络的4个站点的2005年至2008年之间诊断为HF的个体进行了研究。根据出院和门诊就诊诊断,药房配药信息以及在医疗计划电子数据库中发现的影像报告并通过图表审查,确定这些人,他们的用药情况和左心室收缩功能状态。研究人群包括6,210例新诊断的HF-PEF患者和3,914例新诊断的HF-REF患者。我们研究人群的平均年龄为73岁,女性为48%,白种人为74%。 HF-REF患者在发生HF事件之前不太可能接受过各种与心脏和HF相关的药物治疗,但与HF诊断后相比,接受新的心脏药物和HF治疗的可能性要高得多与HF-PEF。在控制了几种潜在的混杂因素之后,HF-PEF患者接受多种心脏药物方案(调整后的优势比(OR)= 0.69; 95%CI 0.59,0.81)和多种HF相关疗法(OR)的可能性大大降低= 0.40; 95%0.38,0.42)。来自大量基于人群的样本的当前结果表明,HF-PEF与HF-REF患者在使用不同心脏药物类别的药物之前和新使用中存在相当大的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号