首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Two general methods for population pharmacokinetic modeling: non-parametric adaptive grid and non-parametric Bayesian
【2h】

Two general methods for population pharmacokinetic modeling: non-parametric adaptive grid and non-parametric Bayesian

机译:人口药代动力学建模的两种通用方法:非参数自适应网格和非参数贝叶斯

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling methods can be statistically classified as either parametric or nonparametric (NP). Each classification can be divided into maximum likelihood (ML) or Bayesian (B) approazches. In this paper we discuss the nonparametric case using both maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches. We present two nonparametric methods for estimating the unknown joint population distribution of model parameter values in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) dataset. The first method is the NP Adaptive Grid (NPAG). The second is the NP Bayesian (NPB) algorithm with a stick-breaking process to construct a Dirichlet prior. Our objective is to compare the performance of these two methods using a simulated PK/PD dataset. Our results showed excellent performance of NPAG and NPB in a realistically simulated PK study. This simulation allowed us to have benchmarks in the form of the true population parameters to compare with the estimates produced by the two methods, while incorporating challenges like unbalanced sample times and sample numbers as well as the ability to include the covariate of patient weight. We conclude that both NPML and NPB can be used in realistic PK/PD population analysis problems. The advantages of one versus the other are discussed in the paper. NPAG and NPB are implemented in R and freely available for download within the Pmetrics package from .
机译:群体药代动力学(PK)建模方法可以在统计上分为参数或非参数(NP)。每种分类可以分为最大似然(ML)或贝叶斯(B)方法。在本文中,我们使用最大似然法和贝叶斯方法讨论了非参数情况。我们提出了两种非参数方法来估计药代动力学/药效学(PK / PD)数据集中模型参数值的未知联合种群分布。第一种方法是NP自适应网格(NPAG)。第二种是NP贝叶斯(NPB)算法,它采用折断过程来构造Dirichlet先验。我们的目标是使用模拟的PK / PD数据集比较这两种方法的性能。我们的结果显示,在实际模拟的PK研究中,NPAG和NPB的性能优异。该模拟使我们能够以真实的总体参数的形式获得基准,以与两种方法得出的估计值进行比较,同时纳入诸如不平衡的采样时间和样本数量以及包含患者体重协变量的能力等挑战。我们得出结论,NPML和NPB均可用于现实的PK / PD人口分析问题。本文讨论了一个相对于另一个的优点。 NPAG和NPB在R中实现,可以从的Pmetrics软件包中免费下载。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号