首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix Investigation of Hoarding
【2h】

A Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix Investigation of Hoarding

机译:trait积的多特征多方法矩阵研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hoarding is a serious and potentially life-threatening mental health problem that, until recently, was considered a subtype of OCD. However, recent research suggests it is distinct and more prevalent than OCD. Three key defining features have emerged in factor analytic studies of hoarding scales: excessive acquisition, difficulty discarding, and excessive clutter. Covariation among these defining features has received limited attention. The primary aim of the current study was to examine the role of the three key features in defining hoarding disorder. Convergent and discriminant validity of the three hoarding factors were examined in a multitrait-multimethod matrix. A secondary aim was to examine the extent to which each hoarding feature distinguished individuals meeting criteria for hoarding from those with OCD and community controls. Although the three-factor model provided an adequate fit for the data and convergent validities were high, the hoarding factors evidenced poor discriminant validity across measures. The findings provide preliminary support for a more parsimonious merging of the clutter, acquisition, and discarding subscales versus parsing out subscale scores. Specifically, the active acquisition of items, buildup of clutter, and difficulty discarding accumulated possessions co-occurred strongly enough to be considered a unidimensional construct. Thus, these symptoms were less attributable to separate phenomena and better conceived as part of a cohesive hoarding phenotype. Each of the three factors discriminated hoarding participants from OCD patients and community controls, but did not discriminate the latter two groups. The findings have implications for treating acquisition as a specifier in DSM-5.
机译:积是一个严重且可能危及生命的心理健康问题,直到最近,它仍被认为是强迫症的一种。但是,最近的研究表明,它比强迫症更为独特和普遍。 ho积秤的因子分析研究中出现了三个关键的定义特征:过度采集,难以丢弃和过度混乱。这些定义特征之间的协变受到了有限的关注。当前研究的主要目的是研究三个关键特征在定义ho积障碍中的作用。在多特征多方法矩阵中检验了三个ho积因素的收敛性和判别有效性。第二个目的是检查每个ho积功能在多大程度上将符合meeting积标准的人与具有强迫症和社区控制的人区分开。尽管三因素模型为数据提供了足够的拟合,并且收敛效度很高,但factors积因素表明跨度量的判别效度差。这些发现为杂化,获取和丢弃子量表与解析子量表分数的更简化的合并提供了初步的支持。特别是,项目的主动获取,混乱的堆积以及难以丢弃积累的所有物的现象非常强烈,足以被认为是一维结构。因此,这些症状较少归因于单独的现象,并且更好地被认为是内聚性ard积表型的一部分。这三个因素中的每一个都将ho积参与者与强迫症患者和社区控制者区分开来,但没有区分后两组。这些发现对于将收购视为DSM-5中的规范具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号