首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Bias Correction Methods for Misclassified Covariates in the Cox Model: comparison offive correction methods by simulation and data analysis
【2h】

Bias Correction Methods for Misclassified Covariates in the Cox Model: comparison offive correction methods by simulation and data analysis

机译:Cox模型中分类不正确的协变量的偏差校正方法:通过仿真和数据分析比较主校正方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Measurement error/misclassification is commonplace in research when variable(s) can notbe measured accurately. A number of statistical methods have been developed to tackle this problemin a variety of settings and contexts. However, relatively few methods are available to handlemisclassified categorical exposure variable(s) in the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Inthis paper, we aim to review and compare different methods to handle this problem - naïvemethods, regression calibration, pooled estimation, multiple imputation, corrected score estimation,and MC-SIMEX - by simulation. These methods are also applied to a life course study with recalleddata and historical records. In practice, the issue of measurement error/misclassification should beaccounted for in design and analysis, whenever possible. Also, in the analysis, it could be moreideal to implement more than one correction method for estimation and inference, with properunderstanding of underlying assumptions.
机译:当无法准确测量变量时,测量误差/分类错误在研究中很常见。已经开发出许多统计方法来在各种环境和背景下解决此问题。但是,在Cox比例风险回归模型中,相对较少的方法可用于处理分类错误的分类暴露变量。在本文中,我们旨在通过仿真回顾和比较解决此问题的不同方法-朴素方法,回归校准,合并估计,多次插补,校正分数估计和MC-SIMEX。这些方法也适用于具有召回数据和历史记录的生命历程研究。在实践中,应尽可能在设计和分析中考虑测量误差/分类错误的问题。同样,在分析中,在适当理解基本假设的基础上,实施不止一种校正方法以进行估计和推断可能更为理想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号