首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Catch Rates Composition and Fish Size from Reefs Managed with Periodically-Harvested Closures
【2h】

Catch Rates Composition and Fish Size from Reefs Managed with Periodically-Harvested Closures

机译:定期捕捞禁渔区对珊瑚礁的捕获率组成和鱼类大小

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Periodically-harvested closures are commonly employed within co-management frameworks to help manage small-scale, multi-species fisheries in the Indo-Pacific. Despite their widespread use, the benefits of periodic harvesting strategies for multi-species fisheries have, to date, been largely untested. We examine catch and effort data from four periodically-harvested reef areas and 55 continuously-fished reefs in Solomon Islands. We test the hypothesis that fishing in periodically-harvested closures would yield: (a) higher catch rates, (b) proportionally more short lived, fast growing, sedentary taxa, and (c) larger finfish and invertebrates, compared to catches from reefs continuously open to fishing. Our study showed that catch rates were significantly higher from periodically-harvested closures for gleaning of invertebrates, but not for line and spear fishing. The family level composition of catches did not vary significantly between open reefs and periodically-harvested closures. Fish captured from periodically-harvested closures were slightly larger, but Trochus niloticus were significantly smaller than those from continuously open reefs. In one case of intense and prolonged harvesting, gleaning catch rates significantly declined, suggesting invertebrate stocks were substantially depleted in the early stages of the open period. Our study suggests periodically-harvested closures can have some short term benefits via increasing harvesting efficiency. However, we did not find evidence that the strategy had substantially benefited multi-species fin-fisheries.
机译:在共同管理框架内通常采用定期捕捞的关闭方式,以帮助管理印度太平洋的小型,多物种渔业。尽管已广泛使用定期捕捞策略对多物种渔业的益处,但迄今为止尚未得到充分验证。我们检查了所罗门群岛四个定期捕捞的珊瑚礁地区和55个连续捕捞的珊瑚礁的捕捞量和努力量数据。我们检验了以下假设:与连续不断地从礁石中捕捞相比,在定期进行捕捞的封闭区中捕捞将产生:开放钓鱼。我们的研究表明,定期捕捞无脊椎动物的捕捞渔获物的捕获率要高得多,但对于钓线和捕捞矛的渔获率却没有。在开阔的礁石和定期收获的封闭区之间,渔获物的家庭构成没有明显变化。从定期捕捞的闭合处捕获的鱼稍大,但尼罗河鳟鱼的鱼比连续开放的礁石的鱼小得多。在一个密集而长时间的收割情况下,收割率明显下降,这表明在开放期的早期,无脊椎动物的种群已大大减少。我们的研究表明,定期收割的封闭带可通过提高收割效率而带来一些短期利益。但是,我们没有找到证据表明该战略已使多物种有鳍渔业大为受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号