首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND CT-BASED STRUCTURAL RIGIDITY ANALYSIS TO ASSESS FAILURE LOAD IN BONES WITH SIMULATED LYTIC DEFECTS
【2h】

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND CT-BASED STRUCTURAL RIGIDITY ANALYSIS TO ASSESS FAILURE LOAD IN BONES WITH SIMULATED LYTIC DEFECTS

机译:有限元分析和基于CT的结构刚度分析可评估模拟缺陷的骨头的破坏载荷

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is an urgent need to improve the prediction of fracture risk for cancer patients with bone metastases. Pathological fractures that result from these tumors frequently occur in the femur. It is extremely difficult to determine the fracture risk even for experienced physicians. Although evolving, fracture risk assessment is still based on inaccurate predictors estimated from previous retrospective studies. As a result, many patients are surgically over-treated, whereas other patients may fracture their bones against expectations.We mechanically tested ten pairs of human cadaveric femurs to failure, where one of each pair had an artificial defect simulating typical metastatic lesions. Prior to testing, finite element (FE) models were generated and computed tomography rigidity analysis (CTRA) was performed to obtain axial and bending rigidity measurements. We compared the two techniques on their capacity to assess femoral failure load by using linear regression techniques, Student's t tests, the Bland-Altman methodology and Kendall rank correlation coefficients.The simulated FE failure loads and CTRA predictions showed good correlation with values obtained from the experimental mechanical testing. Kendall rank correlation coefficients between the FE rankings and the CTRA rankings showed moderate to good correlations. No significant differences in prediction accuracy were found between the two methods.Non-invasive fracture risk assessment techniques currently developed both correlated well with actual failure loads in mechanical testing suggesting that both methods could be further developed into a tool that can be used in clinical practice. The results in this study showed slight differences between the methods, yet validation in prospective patient studies should confirm these preliminary findings.
机译:迫切需要改善对患有骨转移癌患者的骨折风险的预测。由这些肿瘤引起的病理性骨折经常发生在股骨中。即使有经验的医生也很难确定骨折风险。尽管正在发展,但骨折风险评估仍基于先前回顾性研究估计的不准确预测指标。结果,许多患者接受了手术过度治疗,而其他患者则可能骨折,超出预期。我们对十对人尸体的股骨进行了机械测试,其中每对都有一个模拟典型转移性病变的人工缺陷。在测试之前,先生成有限元(FE)模型,然后进行计算机断层扫描刚度分析(CTRA)以获取轴向和弯曲刚度测量值。我们使用线性回归技术,Student's t检验,Bland-Altman方法和Kendall秩相关系数比较了这两种技术评估股骨衰竭负荷的能力。模拟的FE失效负荷和CTRA预测与从股骨头获得的值具有良好的相关性实验机械测试。 FE等级和CTRA等级之间的Kendall等级相关系数显示出中等到良好的相关性。两种方法之间的预测准确性没有显着差异。目前开发的非侵入性骨折风险评估技术与机械测试中的实际失效负荷有很好的相关性,这表明这两种方法可以进一步发展为可用于临床实践的工具。 。这项研究的结果表明这两种方法之间存在细微的差异,但在前瞻性患者研究中的验证应证实这些初步发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号