首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Magnitude of Tobacco Smoking-Betel Quid Chewing-Alcohol Drinking Interaction Effect on Oral Cancer in South-East Asia. A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
【2h】

The Magnitude of Tobacco Smoking-Betel Quid Chewing-Alcohol Drinking Interaction Effect on Oral Cancer in South-East Asia. A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

机译:吸烟对槟榔咀嚼饮酒交互作用对东南亚口腔癌的影响观察研究的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Tobacco smoking, betel quid chewing and alcohol drinking are oral cancer risk factors. Observational studies unanimously report that oral cancer risk in smoking-drinking-chewing exposed subjects is exceptionally high. However, none of them assessed the fractions of this risk attributable to the three individual risk factors and to the smoking-drinking-chewing interaction. The present study sought to assess the magnitude of the smoking-drinking-chewing interaction effect on oral cancer. A meta-analysis of observational South-East Asian studies which reported oral cancer odds ratios (ORs) stratified for smoking-drinking-chewing exposures was performed. The pooled ORs were estimated and controlled for quality, heterogeneity, publication bias and inclusion criteria. The smoking-drinking-chewing interaction effect was estimated through the pooled Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction (RERI, excess risk in smoking-drinking-chewing exposed individuals with respect to the risk expected from the addition of the three individual risks of smoking, drinking and chewing). Fourteen studies were included with low between-study heterogeneity. The pooled ORs for smoking, drinking, chewing, smoking-drinking-chewing, respectively were 3.6 (95% confidence interval −95% CI, 1.9–7.0), 2.2 (95% CI, 1.6–3.0), 7.9 (95% CI, 6.7–9.3), 40.1 (95% CI, 35.1–45.8). The pooled RERI was 28.4 (95% CI, 22.9–33.7). Among smoking-drinking-chewing subjects, the individual effects accounted for 6.7% (smoking), 3.1% (drinking), 17.7% (chewing) of the risk, while the interaction effect accounted for the remaining 72.6%. These data suggest that 44,200 oral cancer cases in South-East Asia annually occur among smoking-drinking-chewing exposed subjects and 40,400 of these are exclusively associated with the interaction effect. Effective oral cancer control policies must consider concurrent tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, betel quid chewing usages as a unique unhealthy lifestyle.
机译:吸烟,槟榔咀嚼和饮酒是口腔癌的危险因素。观察性研究一致报告吸烟,咀嚼和暴露的受试者中口腔癌的风险异常高。但是,他们都没有评估这种风险的比例,该比例可归因于三个单独的风险因素以及吸烟,饮酒,咀嚼相互作用。本研究试图评估吸烟-饮-咀嚼相互作用对口腔癌的影响程度。进行了一项东南亚观察性研究的荟萃分析,该研究报告了按吸烟-咀嚼暴露分类的口腔癌比值比(OR)。评估合并的OR,以控制其质量,异质性,出版偏倚和纳入标准。吸烟-咀嚼-交互作用效应是通过归因于相互作用的相对相对危险度(RERI,即吸烟-咀嚼暴露的个体的超额风险,相对于将吸烟,饮酒这三种个人风险相加得出的预期风险来估算的)和咀嚼)。十四项研究之间的研究异质性低。吸烟,饮水,咀嚼,吸烟-饮酒-咀嚼的合并OR分别为3.6(95%置信区间−95%CI,1.9-7.0),2.2(95%CI,1.6-3.0),7.9(95%CI) ,6.7–9.3),40.1(95%CI,35.1–45.8)。合并的RERI为28.4(95%CI,22.9-33.7)。在吸烟-咀嚼的受试者中,个人效应占风险的6.7%(吸烟),3.1%(饮酒),17.7%(咀嚼),而交互效应占其余的72.6%。这些数据表明,东南亚地区每年有44,200例口腔癌病例发生在吸烟,饮酒,咀嚼的暴露人群中,其中40,400例完全与交互作用有关。有效的口腔癌控制政策必须考虑同时吸烟,饮酒,咀嚼槟榔是一种独特的不健康生活方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号