首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Ethical Considerations for Psychologists Taking a Public Stance on Controversial Issues: The Balance Between Personal and Professional Life
【2h】

Ethical Considerations for Psychologists Taking a Public Stance on Controversial Issues: The Balance Between Personal and Professional Life

机译:对有争议的问题采取公开立场的心理学家的伦理考虑:个人生活与职业生活之间的平衡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous literature has documented the general issues psychologists often face while balancing their personal and professional lives. The struggle stems from attempting to satisfy the need to maintain a life outside of work while having the professional obligation to follow the American Psychological Association’s (APA’s) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (Ethics Code) to prevent their personal lives from interfering with their professional roles and relationships. The present paper analyzes the subject of psychologists taking a public position on controversial public issues. Although the APA Ethics Code does not restrict how psychologists conduct themselves during their personal time, taking a public stance on a controversial issue could potentially strain professional relationships and inadvertently reflect negatively on the profession. The present paper examines ethical issues that a) should be taken into account before psychologists take a public position on a controversial issue, and b) are in conflict with APA’s Ethics Code or current research.
机译:以前的文献记录了心理学家在平衡个人和职业生活时经常面临的一般问题。斗争源于试图满足维持工作以外的生活的需要,同时又有遵守美国心理学会(APA)的《心理学家道德原则》和《行为守则》(《道德守则》)的专业义务,以防止其个人生活受到干扰他们的专业角色和关系。本文分析了在有争议的公共问题上采取公共立场的心理学家的话题。尽管《 APA道德规范》并未限制心理学家在其个人时间中的行为方式,但在有争议的问题上采取公开立场可能会拉伤专业关系,并在无意中对该专业产生负面影响。本文研究了以下伦理问题:a)在心理学家对有争议的问题采取公开立场之前,应考虑在内; b)与APA的《道德守则》或当前的研究相抵触。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号