首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Microbicidal effects of α- and θ-defensins against antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
【2h】

Microbicidal effects of α- and θ-defensins against antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

机译:α-防御素和θ-防御素对抗生素耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的杀菌作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens threaten public health. Because many anti-biotics target specific bacterial enzymes or reactions, corresponding genes may mutate under selection and lead to antibiotic resistance. Accordingly, antimicrobials that selectively target overall microbial cell integrity may offer alternative approaches to therapeutic design. Naturally occurring mammalian α- and θ-defensins are potent, non-toxic microbicides that may be useful for treating infections by antibiotic-resistant pathogens, because certain defensin peptides disrupt bacterial but not mammalian cell membranes. To test this concept, clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), including vancomycin heteroresistant strains, and ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CipR-PA) were tested for sensitivity to α-defensins Crp-4, RMAD-4, and HNPs 1–3, and to RTD-1, a macaque θ-defensin-1. In vitro, 3 µM Crp-4, RMAD-4, and RTD-1 reduced MRSA cell survival by 99%, regardless of vancomycin susceptibility. For PA clinical isolates that differ in fluoroquinolone resistance and virulence phenotype, peptide efficacy was independent of strain ciprofloxacin resistance, site of isolation, or virulence factor expression. Thus, Crp-4, RMAD-4, and RTD-1 are effective in vitro antimicrobials against clinical isolates of MRSA and CipR-PA, perhaps providing templates for development of α- and θ-defensin-based microbicides against antibiotic resistant or virulent infectious agents.
机译:抗抗生素细菌病原体威胁着公共健康。由于许多抗生素靶向特定的细菌酶或反应,因此相应的基因可能会在选择后发生突变并导致抗生素耐药性。因此,选择性靶向总体微生物细胞完整性的抗微生物剂可以为治疗设计提供替代方法。天然存在的哺乳动物α-防御素和θ-防御素是有效的无毒杀微生物剂,可用于治疗抗药性病原体的感染,因为某些防御素肽会破坏细菌,但不会破坏哺乳动物细胞膜。为了验证这一概念,测试了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的临床分离株,包括耐万古霉素的菌株和耐环丙沙星的铜绿假单胞菌(Cip R -PA)对α-防御素Crp的敏感性-4,RMAD-4和HNP 1-3,以及RTD-1是猕猴θ-防御素-1。在体外,无论万古霉素敏感性如何,3 µM Crp-4,RMAD-4和RTD-1都会使MRSA细胞存活率降低99%。对于在氟喹诺酮耐药性和毒力表型方面不同的PA临床分离株,肽的疗效与环丙沙星菌株的耐药性,分离位点或毒力因子表达无关。因此,Crp-4,RMAD-4和RTD-1是针对MRSA和Cip R -PA的临床分离株的有效体外抗菌剂,可能为开发α-防御素和θ-防御素-基抗微生物剂,可抵抗抗生素抗药性或强力传染剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号