首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Statistical Validation of Automatic Methods for Hippocampus Segmentation in MR Images of Epileptic Patients
【2h】

Statistical Validation of Automatic Methods for Hippocampus Segmentation in MR Images of Epileptic Patients

机译:癫痫患者MR图像自动海马分割方法的统计验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hippocampus segmentation is a key step in the evaluation of mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (mTLE) by MR images. Several automated segmentation methods have been introduced for medical image segmentation. Because of multiple edges, missing boundaries, and shape changing along its longitudinal axis, manual outlining still remains the benchmark for hippocampus segmentation, which however, is impractical for large datasets due to time constraints. In this study, four automatic methods, namely FreeSurfer, Hammer, Automatic Brain Structure Segmentation (ABSS), and LocalInfo segmentation, are evaluated to find the most accurate and applicable method that resembles the bench-mark of hippocampus. Results from these four methods are compared against those obtained using manual segmentation for T1-weighted images of 157 symptomatic mTLE patients. For performance evaluation of automatic segmentation, Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, Precision, and Root Mean Square (RMS) distance are extracted and compared. Among these four automated methods, ABSS generates the most accurate results and the reproducibility is more similar to expert manual outlining by statistical validation. By considering p-value<0.05, the results of performance measurement for ABSS reveal that, Dice is 4%, 13%, and 17% higher, Hausdorff is 23%, 87%, and 70% lower, precision is 5%, -5%, and 12% higher, and RMS is 19%, 62%, and 65% lower compared to LocalInfo, FreeSurfer, and Hammer, respectively.
机译:海马分割是MR图像评估颞叶颞叶癫痫(mTLE)的关键步骤。已经引入了几种自动分割方法来进行医学图像分割。由于存在多个边缘,缺少边界以及沿其纵轴的形状变化,手动概述仍然是海马分割的基准,但是由于时间限制,对于大型数据集来说这是不切实际的。在这项研究中,对四种自动方法(即FreeSurfer,Hammer,自动脑结构分割(ABSS)和LocalInfo分割)进行了评估,以找到与海马基准相似的最准确,最适用的方法。将这四种方法的结果与使用人工分割获得的157例有症状mTLE患者的T1加权图像的结果进行比较。为了评估自动分割的性能,提取并比较了Dice系数,Hausdorff距离,精度和均方根(RMS)距离。在这四种自动化方法中,ABSS产生最准确的结果,并且可重复性与通过统计验证的专家手动概述更相似。通过考虑p值<0.05,ABSS的性能测量结果表明,Dice分别提高了4%,13%和17%,Hausdorff降低了23%,87%和70%,精度为5%,-与LocalInfo,FreeSurfer和Hammer相比,RMS分别高5%和12%,并且RMS分别低19%,62%和65%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号