首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >When and How Do Seizures Kill Neurons and Is Cell Death Relevant to Epileptogenesis?
【2h】

When and How Do Seizures Kill Neurons and Is Cell Death Relevant to Epileptogenesis?

机译:癫痫发作何时如何杀死神经元细胞死亡与癫痫发生有关吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effect of seizures on neuronal death and the role of seizure-induced neuronal death in acquired epileptogenesis have been debated for decades. Isolated brief seizures probably do not kill neurons; however, severe and repetitive seizures (i.e., status epilepticus) certainly do. Because status epilepticus both kills neurons and also leads to chronic epilepsy, neuronal death has been proposed to be an integral part of acquired epileptogenesis. Several studies, particularly in the immature brain, have suggested that neuronal death is not necessary for acquired epileptogenesis; however, the lack of neuronal death is difficult if not impossible to prove, and more recent studies have challenged this concept. Novel mechanisms of cell death, beyond the traditional concepts of necrosis and apoptosis, include autophagy, phagoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis. The traditional proposal for why neuronal death may be necessary for epileptogenesis is based on the recapitulation of development hypothesis, where a loss of synaptic input from the dying neurons is considered a critical signal to induce axonal sprouting and synaptic-circuit reorganization. We propose a second hypothesis – the neuronal death pathway hypothesis, which states that the biochemical pathways causing programmed neurodegeneration, rather than neuronal death per se, are responsible for or contribute to epileptogenesis. The reprogramming of neuronal death pathways – if true – is proposed to derive from necroptosis or pyroptosis. The proposed new hypothesis may inform on why neuronal death seems closely linked to epileptogenesis, but may not always be.
机译:癫痫发作对神经元死亡的影响以及癫痫发作诱发的神经元死亡在获得性癫痫发生中的作用已有数十年的历史。孤立的短暂性癫痫发作可能不会杀死神经元。但是,严重且反复的癫痫发作(即癫痫持续状态)当然可以。由于癫痫持续状态不仅会杀死神经元,还会导致慢性癫痫,因此,神经元死亡被认为是获得性癫痫发生必不可少的部分。多项研究,特别是在未成熟大脑中的研究表明,神经元死亡对于获得性癫痫的发生不是必需的。然而,即使不是不可能的话,缺乏神经元死亡也是困难的,而且最近的研究对这一概念提出了挑战。除了传统的坏死和凋亡概念之外,新的细胞死亡机制还包括自噬,吞噬,坏死性坏死和烧死。关于为什么神经元死亡可能是癫痫发生必不可少的传统建议是基于对发展假说的概括,在这种假说中,垂死的神经元失去的突触输入被认为是诱导轴突发芽和突触回路重组的关键信号。我们提出第二种假设-神经元死亡途径假说,该假说指出导致程序性神经退行性变而不是神经元本身死亡的生化途径是造成癫痫发生的原因或做出了贡献。提议对神经元死亡途径进行重编程(如果正确的话)是从坏死病或发烧病中衍生出来的。提出的新假设可能可以解释为什么神经元死亡似乎与癫痫发生密切相关,但可能并非总是如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号