首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >What-Where-When Memory in the Rodent Odor Span Task
【2h】

What-Where-When Memory in the Rodent Odor Span Task

机译:啮齿动物气味跨区任务中的何时何地内存

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While the Odor Span Task (OST) was developed to assess working memory in rodents, it appears that odor (“What”) and time since an odor was last reinforced (“When”) jointly control responding in the OST. The OST uses an incrementing non-match to sample procedure such that the number of stimuli to remember increases during the session; the rodent is trained to remember stimuli within a session but not between sessions. We used a variation of the OST to add a “Where” dimension to the task to examine whether rodents could learn to respond to scents based on contextual cues as well. In Experiment 1, 6 rats well-trained on the OST procedure were exposed to four target scents in a holding cage before the OST session began [What-Where-When (WWW) condition]. When these target scents appeared in the OST, rats treated them as novel scents despite their being previously encountered that day; WWW responding was comparable to baseline (BL) responding. Controls were implemented to account for relative familiarity: frequency of target presentation and time since the target odor was presented. On both types of control probes, rats typically responded to target scents less than during WWW or BL conditions, took longer to make a response, and visited more comparison stimuli. In Experiment 2, the study was replicated adding reinforcement delivery for responding to pre-session presentation of target stimuli. Subjects were the same 6 rats plus 2 additional rats also well-trained on the OST. Results were similar to those from Experiment 1. These data indicate that the variables controlling performance on the OST task include What stimulus is presented, Where (i.e., in which location) it was presented, and When it was presented. Thus, the OST-probe methodology may provide a useful vehicle for the study of episodic-like memory processes in non-humans.
机译:尽管开发了气味跨度任务(OST)来评估啮齿动物的工作记忆,但似乎气味(“什么”)和自上次增强气味(“何时”)以来的时间共同控制了OST的响应。 OST使用递增的不匹配来采样过程,以便在会话过程中记住的刺激数量增加。训练啮齿动物记住一个疗程内的刺激,而不是在两个疗程之间。我们使用OST的变体在任务中添加了“ Where”维度,以检查啮齿动物是否也可以根据上下文线索学习对气味的反应。在实验1中,在OST会话开始之前[What-Where-When(WWW)条件]之前,经过OST程序训练有素的6只大鼠在保持笼中暴露于四种目标气味。当这些目标气味出现在OST中时,大鼠将它们视为新的气味,尽管它们是在那天遇到的。 WWW响应与基线(BL)响应相当。实施控制措施是为了说明相对熟悉度:目标呈现的频率和自呈现目标气味以来的时间。在两种类型的对照探针上,大鼠对目标气味的反应通常少于在WWW或BL条件下的反应,需要更长的时间做出反应,并且访问了更多的比较刺激物。在实验2中,重复了这项研究,增加了增强递送以响应靶标刺激的赛前表现。受试者是相同的6只大鼠加上另外2只也在OST上训练有素的大鼠。结果与实验1的结果相似。这些数据表明,控制OST任务性能的变量包括刺激的种类,刺激的位置(即位置)和刺激的时间。因此,OST-探针方法学可以为研究非人类中的类似发作的记忆过程提供有用的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号