首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Model Misspecification When Excluding Instrumental Variables From PS Models in Settings Where Instruments Modify the Effects of Covariates on Treatment
【2h】

Model Misspecification When Excluding Instrumental Variables From PS Models in Settings Where Instruments Modify the Effects of Covariates on Treatment

机译:在仪器修改协变量对治疗的影响的设置中从PS模型中排除工具变量时出现模型错误指定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Theory and simulations show that variables affecting the outcome only through exposure, known as instrumental variables (IVs), should be excluded from propensity score (PS) models. In pharmacoepidemiologic studies based on automated healthcare databases, researchers will sometimes use a single PS model to control for confounding when evaluating the effect of a treatment on multiple outcomes. Because these “full” models are not constructed with a specific outcome in mind, they will usually contain a large number of IVs for any individual study or outcome. If researchers subsequently decide to evaluate a subset of the outcomes in more detail, they can construct reduced “outcome-specific” models that exclude IVs for the particular study. Accurate estimates of PSs that do not condition on IVs, however, can be compromised when simply excluding instruments from the full PS model. This misspecification may have a negligible impact on effect estimates in many settings, but is likely to be more pronounced for situations where instruments modify the effects of covariates on treatment (instrument-confounder interactions). In studies evaluating drugs during early dissemination, the effects of covariates on treatment are likely modified over calendar time and IV-confounder interaction effects on treatment are likely to exist. In these settings, refitting more flexible PS models after excluding IVs and IV-confounder interactions can work well. The authors propose an alternative method based on the concept of marginalization that can be used to remove the negative effects of controlling for IVs and IV-confounder interactions without having to refit the full PS model. This method fits the full PS model, including IVs and IV-confounder interactions, but marginalizes over values of the instruments. Fitting more flexible PS models after excluding IVs or using the full model to marginalize over IVs can prevent model misspecification along with the negative effects of balancing instruments in certain settings.
机译:理论和模拟表明,仅通过暴露影响结果的变量(即工具变量(IVs))应从倾向评分(PS)模型中排除。在基于自动化医疗数据库的药物流行病学研究中,研究人员有时会在评估治疗对多种结果的影响时使用单个PS模型来控制混淆。由于这些“完整”模型在构建时并未考虑到特定的结果,因此对于任何单独的研究或结果,它们通常将包含大量的IV。如果研究人员随后决定更详细地评估结果的子集,则他们可以构建减少的“特定于结果的”模型,从而排除特定研究的IV。但是,仅从完整的PS模型中排除仪器时,可能会损害不依赖IV的PS的准确估计。在许多情况下,这种错误指定可能对效果估计的影响可忽略不计,但对于仪器修改协变量对治疗的影响(仪器与混杂物相互作用)的情况而言,这种影响可能更为明显。在评估药物在早期传播过程中的研究中,协变量对治疗的影响可能会在整个日历时间内发生变化,并且IV-混杂因素相互作用对治疗的影响可能会存在。在这些设置中,排除IV和IV与混杂因素的交互之后,重新装配更灵活的PS模型可以很好地工作。作者提出了一种基于边缘化概念的替代方法,该方法可用于消除控制IV和IV-混杂因素相互作用的负面影响,而不必重新构建完整的PS模型。这种方法适合完整的PS模型,包括IV和IV-混杂因素的交互作用,但是使工具的价值微不足道。在排除IV后使用更灵活的PS模型或使用完整模型对IV进行边际化可以防止模型规格不正确以及在某些情况下平衡工具的负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号