首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Definite Differences between In Vitro Actin-Myosin Sliding and Muscle Contraction as Revealed Using Antibodies to Myosin Head
【2h】

Definite Differences between In Vitro Actin-Myosin Sliding and Muscle Contraction as Revealed Using Antibodies to Myosin Head

机译:使用肌球蛋白头抗体揭示的体外肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白滑动与肌肉收缩之间的确定差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Muscle contraction results from attachment-detachment cycles between myosin heads extending from myosin filaments and actin filaments. It is generally believed that a myosin head first attaches to actin, undergoes conformational changes to produce force and motion in muscle, and then detaches from actin. Despite extensive studies, the molecular mechanism of myosin head conformational changes still remains to be a matter for debate and speculation. The myosin head consists of catalytic (CAD), converter (CVD) and lever arm (LD) domains. To give information about the role of these domains in the myosin head performance, we have examined the effect of three site-directed antibodies to the myosin head on in vitro ATP-dependent actin-myosin sliding and Ca2+-activated contraction of muscle fibers. Antibody 1, attaching to junctional peptide between 50K and 20K heavy chain segments in the CAD, exhibited appreciable effects neither on in vitro actin-myosin sliding nor muscle fiber contraction. Since antibody 1 covers actin-binding sites of the CAD, one interpretation of this result is that rigor actin-myosin linkage is absent or at most a transient intermediate in physiological actin-myosin cycling. Antibody 2, attaching to reactive lysine residue in the CVD, showed a marked inhibitory effect on in vitro actin-myosin sliding without changing actin-activated myosin head (S1) ATPase activity, while it showed no appreciable effect on muscle contraction. Antibody 3, attaching to two peptides of regulatory light chains in the LD, had no significant effect on in vitro actin-myosin sliding, while it reduced force development in muscle fibers without changing MgATPase activity. The above definite differences in the effect of antibodies 2 and 3 between in vitro actin-myosin sliding and muscle contraction can be explained by difference in experimental conditions; in the former, myosin heads are randomly oriented on a glass surface, while in the latter myosin heads are regularly arranged within filament-lattice structures.
机译:肌肉收缩是由从肌球蛋白丝和肌动蛋白丝延伸的肌球蛋白头之间的附着-分离循环导致的。通常认为,肌球蛋白头首先附着于肌动蛋白,经历构象变化以在肌肉中产生力和运动,然后与肌动蛋白分离。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但肌球蛋白头部构象变化的分子机制仍然有待讨论和推测。肌球蛋白头由催化(CAD),转化器(CVD)和杠杆臂(LD)域组成。为了提供这些结构域在肌球蛋白头表现中的作用的信息,我们检查了三种针对肌球蛋白头的定点抗体对体外ATP依赖性肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白滑动和Ca 2 + 激活的肌纤维收缩。附着在CAD中50K和20K重链段之间的结合肽上的抗体1对体外肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白的滑动或肌纤维收缩均未显示明显的作用。由于抗体1覆盖了CAD的肌动蛋白结合位点,因此这一结果的一种解释是生理肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白循环中不存在严格的肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白连接,或至多是短暂的中间产物。附着在CVD中反应性赖氨酸残基上的抗体2对体外肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白滑动显示出显着的抑制作用,而没有改变肌动蛋白激活的肌球蛋白头(S1)ATPase的活性,而对肌肉收缩则没有明显的影响。抗体3附着在LD的两条调节性轻链肽上,对体外肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白的滑动没有显着影响,同时它在不改变MgATPase活性的情况下减少了肌纤维的力量发展。体外肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白滑动和肌肉收缩之间抗体2和3的作用之间的上述确定差异可以通过实验条件的差异来解释;在前者中,肌球蛋白头随机地定向在玻璃表面上,而在后者中,肌球蛋白头规则地排列在细丝-晶格结构内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号