首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Subjective Cognitive Complaints Contribute to Misdiagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment
【2h】

Subjective Cognitive Complaints Contribute to Misdiagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment

机译:主观认知投诉有助于轻度认知障碍的误诊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Subjective cognitive complaints are a criterion for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), despite their uncertain relationship to objective memory performance in MCI. We aimed to examine self-reported cognitive complaints in subgroups of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) MCI cohort to determine whether they are a valuable inclusion in the diagnosis of MCI or, alternatively, if they contribute to misdiagnosis. Subgroups of MCI were derived using cluster analysis of baseline neuropsychological test data from 448 ADNI MCI participants. Cognitive complaints were assessed via the Everyday Cognition (ECog) questionnaire, and discrepancy scores were calculated between self- and informant-report. Cluster analysis revealed Amnestic and Mixed cognitive phenotypes as well as a third Cluster-Derived Normal subgroup (41.3%), whose neuropsychological and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarker profiles did not differ from a “robust” normal control group. This cognitively intact phenotype of MCI participants overestimated their cognitive problems relative to their informant, whereas Amnestic MCI participants with objective memory impairment underestimated their cognitive problems. Underestimation of cognitive problems was associated with positive CSF AD biomarkers and progression to dementia. Overall, there was no relationship between self-reported cognitive complaints and objective cognitive functioning, but significant correlations were observed with depressive symptoms. The inclusion of self-reported complaints in MCI diagnostic criteria may cloud rather than clarify diagnosis and result in high rates of misclassification of MCI. Discrepancies between self- and informant-report demonstrate that overestimation of cognitive problems is characteristic of normal aging while underestimation may reflect greater risk for cognitive decline.
机译:主观认知障碍是轻度认知障碍(MCI)诊断的标准,尽管它们与MCI中的客观记忆表现不确定。我们的目的是检查阿尔茨海默氏病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)MCI队列中的自我报告的认知障碍,以确定它们是否对MCI的诊断有价值,或者是否有助于误诊。 MCI的亚组是使用来自448位ADNI MCI参与者的基线神经心理学测试数据的聚类分析得出的。通过日常认知(ECog)问卷评估认知投诉,并计算自我报告和举报人报告之间的差异分数。聚类分析显示记忆消除和混合认知表型,以及第三个聚类衍生的正常亚组(41.3%),其神经心理学和脑脊髓液(CSF)阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)生物标志物谱与“健壮”正常对照组没有差异。 MCI参与者的这种认知完好的表型相对于他们的线人高估了他们的认知问题,而具有客观记忆障碍的失忆MCI参与者则低估了他们的认知问题。认知问题的低估与CSF AD生物标志物阳性和发展为痴呆有关。总体而言,自我报告的认知障碍与客观认知功能之间没有关系,但是与抑郁症状之间存在显着相关性。在MCI诊断标准中包含自我报告的投诉可能会混淆而不是澄清诊断,并且会导致MCI错误分类的发生率很高。自我报告和举报人报告之间的差异表明,对认知问题的高估是正常衰老的特征,而低估可能反映出认知下降的更大风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号