首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Facing danger: how do people behave in times of need? The case of adult attachment styles
【2h】

Facing danger: how do people behave in times of need? The case of adult attachment styles

机译:面临的危险:人们在有需要时如何表现?成人依恋风格的情况

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

attachment theory has generated an enormous body of research and conceptual elaborations. Although attachment theory and research propose that attachment security provides a person with many adaptive advantages, during all phases of the life cycle, numerous studies indicate that almost half of the human species can be classified as insecurely attached or insecure with respect to attachment. It seems odd that evolution left humans in this vulnerable position, unless there are some advantages to individuals or groups, under at least some conditions, of anxious and avoidant attachment styles. I argue that a social group containing members with different attachment patterns may be more conducive to survival than a homogeneous group of securely attached individuals because each attachment disposition has specific adaptive advantages that promote the survival of the individual and people around him or her when facing threats and perils. In making this argument, I extend the scope of attachment theory and research by considering a broader range of adaptive functions of insecure attachment strategies, and present data to support my argument.
机译:依恋理论已经产生了大量的研究和概念阐述。尽管依恋理论和研究提出依恋安全性可以为人提供许多适应性优势,但是在生命周期的各个阶段,许多研究表明,几乎有一半的人类可以归为依恋不安全或依恋不安全。进化使人类处于这种脆弱的境地似乎很奇怪,除非在至少某些情况下,焦虑或回避的依恋方式对个人或群体具有某些优势。我认为,包含具有不同依恋模式的成员的社会团体可能比同质的依恋依恋者群体更有利于生存,因为每个依恋倾向都有特定的适应性优势,可以在面对威胁时促进个人和周围人的生存和危险。在提出这一论点时,我通过考虑范围更广的不安全依恋策略的适应功能,扩展了依恋理论和研究的范围,并提出了数据来支持我的论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号