首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Investigation of CPD and HMDS Sample Preparation Techniques for Cervical Cells in Developing Computer-Aided Screening System Based on FE-SEM/EDX
【2h】

Investigation of CPD and HMDS Sample Preparation Techniques for Cervical Cells in Developing Computer-Aided Screening System Based on FE-SEM/EDX

机译:基于FE-SEM / EDX的计算机辅助筛查系统开发中宫颈细胞CPD和HMDS样品制备技术的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper investigated the effects of critical-point drying (CPD) and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) sample preparation techniques for cervical cells on field emission scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (FE-SEM/EDX). We investigated the visualization of cervical cell image and elemental distribution on the cervical cell for two techniques of sample preparation. Using FE-SEM/EDX, the cervical cell images are captured and the cell element compositions are extracted for both sample preparation techniques. Cervical cell image quality, elemental composition, and processing time are considered for comparison of performances. Qualitatively, FE-SEM image based on HMDS preparation technique has better image quality than CPD technique in terms of degree of spread cell on the specimen and morphologic signs of cell deteriorations (i.e., existence of plate and pellet drying artifacts and membrane blebs). Quantitatively, with mapping and line scanning EDX analysis, carbon and oxygen element compositions in HMDS technique were higher than the CPD technique in terms of weight percentages. The HMDS technique has shorter processing time than the CPD technique. The results indicate that FE-SEM imaging, elemental composition, and processing time for sample preparation with the HMDS technique were better than CPD technique for cervical cell preparation technique for developing computer-aided screening system.
机译:本文研究了宫颈细胞的临界点干燥(CPD)和六甲基二硅氮烷(HMDS)样品制备技术对场发射扫描电子显微镜和能量色散X射线(FE-SEM / EDX)的影响。我们研究了两种样品制备技术对宫颈细胞图像的可视化和宫颈细胞上元素分布的影响。使用FE-SEM / EDX,可以捕获宫颈细胞图像,并提取两种样品制备技术所需的细胞成分。考虑宫颈细胞图像质量,元素组成和处理时间以比较性能。定性地,基于HMDS制备技术的FE-SEM图像在标本上的散布细胞程度和细胞变质的形态迹象(即存在平板和颗粒干燥伪影以及膜泡)方面比CPD技术具有更好的图像质量。定量地,通过作图和线扫描EDX分析,就重量百分比而言,HMDS技术中的碳和氧元素组成高于CPD技术。 HMDS技术比CPD技术具有更短的处理时间。结果表明,用HMDS技术制备样品的FE-SEM成像,元素组成和处理时间要优于用于计算机辅助筛选系统的宫颈细胞制备技术的CPD技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号