首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Using the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit to Improve the Quality of Patient Materials
【2h】

Using the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit to Improve the Quality of Patient Materials

机译:使用健康素养通用预防措施工具包改善患者材料的质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patient materials are often written above the reading level of most adults. Tool 11 of the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit (“Design Easy-to-Read Material”) provides guidance on ensuring that written patient materials are easy to understand. As part of a pragmatic demonstration of the Toolkit, we examined how four primary care practices implemented Tool 11 and whether written materials improved as a result. We conducted interviews to learn about practices' implementation activities and assessed the readability, understandability, and actionability of patient education materials collected during pre- and postimplementation site visits. Interview data indicated that practices followed many action steps recommended in Tool 11, including training staff, assessing readability, and developing or revising materials, typically focusing on brief documents such as patient letters and information sheets. Many of the revised and newly developed documents had reading levels appropriate for most patients and—in the case of revised documents—better readability than the original materials. In contrast, the readability, understandability, and actionability of lengthier patient education materials were poor and did not improve over the 6-month implementation period. Findings guided revisions to Tool 11 and highlighted the importance of engaging multiple stakeholders in improving the quality of patient materials.
机译:患者资料通常写在大多数成年人的阅读水平之上。 《健康素养通用预防措施工具包》的工具11(“设计易于阅读的材料”)为确保书面患者材料易于理解提供了指导。作为对该工具包的实用演示的一部分,我们检查了四种初级保健实践如何实施工具11以及书面材料是否得到了改善。我们进行了访谈,以了解实践的实施活动,并评估了实施前后的实地访问期间收集的患者教育材料的可读性,可理解性和可操作性。访谈数据表明,实践遵循工具11中建议的许多行动步骤,包括培训人员,评估可读性以及编写或修订材料,通常着重于简短文件,例如患者信函和信息表。许多经修订和新开发的文档具有适合大多数患者的阅读水平,并且在修订文档的情况下,其可读性比原始材料更好。相反,较长的患者教育材料的可读性,可理解性和可操作性很差,并且在6个月的实施期内没有改善。调查结果指导了对工具11的修订,并强调了让多个利益相关者参与改善患者材料质量的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号