首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A comparison between block and smooth modeling in finite element simulations of tDCS
【2h】

A comparison between block and smooth modeling in finite element simulations of tDCS

机译:tDCS有限元模拟中块与平滑建模的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current density distributions in five selected structures, namely, anterior superior temporal gyrus (ASTG), hippocampus (HIP), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), occipital lobe (OCC) and pre-central gyrus (PRC) were investigated as part of a comparison between electrostatic finite element models constructed directly from MRI-resolution data (block models), and smoothed tetrahedral finite element models (smooth models). Three electrode configurations were applied, mimicking different tDCS therapies. Smooth model simulations were found to require three times longer to complete. The percentage differences between mean and median current densities of each model type in arbitrarily chosen brain structures ranged from −33.33–48.08%. No clear relationship was found between structure volumes and current density differences between the two model types. Tissue regions nearby the electrodes demonstrated the least percentage differences between block and smooth models. Therefore, block models may be adequate to predict current density values in cortical regions presumed targeted by tDCS.
机译:作为比较的一部分,研究了五个选定结构的电流密度分布,即前颞上回(ASTG),海马(HIP),额额下回(IFG),枕叶(OCC)和中央前回(PRC)直接从MRI分辨率数据构建的静电有限元模型(块模型)和平滑的四面体有限元模型(平滑模型)之间。应用了三种电极配置,以模仿不同的tDCS治疗。发现平滑模型仿真需要三倍的时间才能完成。在任意选择的大脑结构中,每种模型类型的平均电流密度和中值电流密度之间的百分比差异为-33.33–48.08%。在两种模型类型之间的结构体积和电流密度差异之间未发现明确的关系。电极附近的组织区域显示出阻滞模型和平滑模型之间的百分比差异最小。因此,块模型可能足以预测假定为tDCS目标的皮质区域中的电流密度值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号