首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior >Choice of higher density signalled shock over lower density unsignalled shock
【2h】

Choice of higher density signalled shock over lower density unsignalled shock

机译:选择较高密度的信号冲击而不是较低密度的无信号冲击

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Unsignalled, inescapable shocks were presented to four albino rats in Experiment 1. By pressing a lever subjects could change the condition to signalled shock for 3-min periods after which unsignalled shock was automatically reinstated. All subjects changed from unsignalled to signalled shock when shock density was the same or when the density of signalled shock was two times greater than unsignalled shock. When the density of signalled shock was four times that of unsignalled shock, three subjects changed to the higher density schedule. One subject changed to a density of signalled shock eight times that of unsignalled shock. The second study showed that the two shock schedules most similar in Experiment 1 were discriminably different because subjects chose lower over higher shock densities when both densities were unsignalled. An analysis stressing safe (signal absent) and unsafe (signal present) periods was discussed.
机译:在实验1中,对四只白化病大鼠进行了无信号的,不可避免的电击。通过按下操纵杆,受试者可以在3分钟的时间内将状态更改为发信号的电击,此后将自动恢复无信号的电击。当电击密度相同或当发信号电击的密度是无信号电击的两倍时,所有受试者都从无信号电击变为有信号电击。当发出信号的电击的密度是未发出信号的电击的密度的四倍时,三名受试者更改为较高密度的日程表。一名受试者的发信号电击密度改变为无信号发电击的密度的八倍。第二项研究表明,在实验1中最相似的两种电击方案有明显区别,因为当两种密度都没有变化时,受试者会选择较低的冲击密度而不是较高的冲击密度。讨论了强调安全(无信号)和不安全(有信号)时段的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号