首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields
【2h】

All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields

机译:并非所有STEM领域都是平等的:人与物的利益解释了STEM领域中的性别差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The degree of women's underrepresentation varies by STEM fields. Women are now overrepresented in social sciences, yet only constitute a fraction of the engineering workforce. In the current study, we investigated the gender differences in interests as an explanation for the differential distribution of women across sub-disciplines of STEM as well as the overall underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. Specifically, we meta-analytically reviewed norm data on basic interests from 52 samples in 33 interest inventories published between 1964 and 2007, with a total of 209,810 male and 223,268 female respondents. We found gender differences in interests to vary largely by STEM field, with the largest gender differences in interests favoring men observed in engineering disciplines (d = 0.83–1.21), and in contrast, gender differences in interests favoring women in social sciences and medical services (d = −0.33 and −0.40, respectively). Importantly, the gender composition (percentages of women) in STEM fields reflects these gender differences in interests. The patterns of gender differences in interests and the actual gender composition in STEM fields were explained by the people-orientation and things-orientation of work environments, and were not associated with the level of quantitative ability required. These findings suggest potential interventions targeting interests in STEM education to facilitate individuals' ability and career development and strategies to reform work environments to better attract and retain women in STEM occupations.
机译:妇女代表不足的程度因STEM领域而异。现在,妇女在社会科学领域的人数过多,但仅占工程技术人员的一小部分。在当前的研究中,我们调查了兴趣方面的性别差异,以解释STEM子学科中女性的差异分布以及STEM领域中女性的总体代表性不足。具体而言,我们对1964年至2007年间发布的33个兴趣清单中的52个样本的基本利益的规范数据进行了元分析,共计209,810位男性和223,268位女性受访者。我们发现,兴趣的性别差异在STEM领域存在很大差异,在工程学科中,最大的性别差异有利于男性(d = 0.83–1.21),相反,在社会科学和医疗服务方面,性别差异有利于女性(d分别为-0.33和-0.40)。重要的是,STEM领域中的性别组成(女性百分比)反映了这些性别差异。 STEM领域中兴趣上的性别差异和实际性别组成的模式是通过以人为本和以事物为导向的工作环境来解释的,并且与所需的定量能力水平无关。这些发现暗示了针对STEM教育兴趣的潜在干预措施,以促进个人的能力和职业发展,以及改革工作环境以更好地吸引和留住妇女从事STEM职业的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号