首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Does Impulsiveness Moderate Response to Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Pregnant and Newly Postpartum Women?
【2h】

Does Impulsiveness Moderate Response to Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Pregnant and Newly Postpartum Women?

机译:在孕妇和刚产后的妇女中冲动是否会适度缓解对戒烟的经济动机?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We examined whether impulsiveness moderates response to financial incentives for cessation among pregnant smokers. All participants were randomized to either a condition wherein financial incentives were delivered contingent on smoking abstinence or to a control condition wherein incentives were delivered independent of smoking status. The study was conducted in two steps: First, we examined associations between baseline impulsiveness scores and abstinence at late pregnancy and 24-weeks postpartum as part of a planned prospective study of this topic using data from a recently completed, randomized controlled clinical trial (N = 118). Next, to increase statistical power, we conducted a second analysis collapsing results across that recent trial and two prior trials involving the same contingent incentive and control conditions (N = 236). Impulsivity was assessed using a delay discounting (DD) of hypothetical monetary rewards task in all three trials and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) in the most recent trial. Neither DD nor BIS predicted antepartum or postpartum smoking status in the single or combined trials. Receiving abstinence-contingent incentives, lower baseline smoking rate (cigs/day), and a history of quit attempts pre-pregnancy predicted greater odds of antepartum abstinence across the single and combined trials. No variable predicted postpartum abstinence across the single and combined trials, although a history of antepartum quit attempts and receiving abstinence-contingent incentives predicted in the single and combined trials, respectively. Overall, this study provides no evidence that impulsiveness as assessed by DD or BIS moderates response to this treatment approach while underscoring a substantial association of smoking rate and prior quit attempts with abstinence across the contingent incentives and control treatment conditions.
机译:我们研究了冲动是否能减轻孕妇吸烟者戒烟对经济刺激的反应。将所有参与者随机分配到根据戒烟而提供经济奖励的情况下或与吸烟状况无关地提供激励的对照条件下。这项研究分两个步骤进行:首先,我们使用最近完成的一项随机对照临床试验的数据,对妊娠晚期和产后24周的基线冲动得分与禁欲之间的关联进行了研究,以此作为该主题的计划前瞻性研究的一部分。 = 118)。接下来,为了提高统计能力,我们对最近的一项试验和涉及相同或有激励和控制条件(N = 236)的两项先前试验进行了第二次分析,以合并结果。在所有三个试验中均使用假设性金钱奖励任务的延迟折扣(DD)和最新试验中的Barratt冲动量表(BIS)评估了冲动性。在单项或合并试验中,DD和BIS均未预测产前或产后吸烟状态。接受禁欲药物诱因,较低的基线吸烟率(香烟/天)以及妊娠前戒烟尝试的历史表明,在单项试验和联合试验中,产前禁酒的几率更高。尽管有一次产前戒烟尝试和接受分别在单次试验和联合试验中预测的禁欲或诱因的历史,但在单项试验和联合试验中没有变量预测产后禁欲。总的来说,这项研究没有证据表明由DD或BIS评估的冲动会减轻对这种治疗方法的反应,同时强调在偶然的诱因和控制治疗条件下,吸烟率和以前的戒烟尝试与戒断之间存在实质联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号