首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Estimating Bacterial Diversity for Ecological Studies: Methods Metrics and Assumptions
【2h】

Estimating Bacterial Diversity for Ecological Studies: Methods Metrics and Assumptions

机译:估算用于生态学研究的细菌多样性:方法指标和假设

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Methods to estimate microbial diversity have developed rapidly in an effort to understand the distribution and diversity of microorganisms in natural environments. For bacterial communities, the 16S rRNA gene is the phylogenetic marker gene of choice, but most studies select only a specific region of the 16S rRNA to estimate bacterial diversity. Whereas biases derived from from DNA extraction, primer choice and PCR amplification are well documented, we here address how the choice of variable region can influence a wide range of standard ecological metrics, such as species richness, phylogenetic diversity, β-diversity and rank-abundance distributions. We have used Illumina paired-end sequencing to estimate the bacterial diversity of 20 natural lakes across Switzerland derived from three trimmed variable 16S rRNA regions (V3, V4, V5). Species richness, phylogenetic diversity, community composition, β-diversity, and rank-abundance distributions differed significantly between 16S rRNA regions. Overall, patterns of diversity quantified by the V3 and V5 regions were more similar to one another than those assessed by the V4 region. Similar results were obtained when analyzing the datasets with different sequence similarity thresholds used during sequences clustering and when the same analysis was used on a reference dataset of sequences from the Greengenes database. In addition we also measured species richness from the same lake samples using ARISA Fingerprinting, but did not find a strong relationship between species richness estimated by Illumina and ARISA. We conclude that the selection of 16S rRNA region significantly influences the estimation of bacterial diversity and species distributions and that caution is warranted when comparing data from different variable regions as well as when using different sequencing techniques.
机译:为了了解自然环境中微生物的分布和多样性,估算微生物多样性的方法迅速发展。对于细菌群落,16S rRNA基因是选择的系统发育标记基因,但是大多数研究仅选择16S rRNA的特定区域来估计细菌多样性。尽管DNA提取,引物选择和PCR扩增产生的偏倚已得到充分证明,但我们在这里讨论可变区的选择如何影响广泛的标准生态指标,例如物种丰富度,系统发育多样性,β多样性和等级-丰度分布。我们已经使用Illumina的双端测序来估计瑞士20个天然湖泊的细菌多样性,这些细菌来自三个修剪的16S rRNA可变区域(V3,V4,V5)。 16S rRNA区域之间的物种丰富度,系统发育多样性,群落组成,β多样性和秩-丰度分布显着不同。总体而言,由V3和V5区域量化的多样性模式比由V4区域评估的多样性模式更为相似。使用序列聚类过程中使用的具有不同序列相似性阈值的数据集进行分析,以及对Greengenes数据库中序列的参考数据集进行相同的分析时,也会获得相似的结果。此外,我们还使用ARISA指纹图谱测量了同一湖泊样品的物种丰富度,但并未发现Illumina和ARISA估计的物种丰富度之间有很强的关系。我们得出的结论是,选择16S rRNA区域会显着影响细菌多样性和物种分布的估计,在比较来自不同可变区的数据以及使用不同的测序技术时,必须谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号