首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Yield Responses of Wheat to Mulching Practices in Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau
【2h】

Yield Responses of Wheat to Mulching Practices in Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau

机译:黄土高原旱地小麦覆盖方式对小麦的产量响应。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Improving farming practices of soil and water conservation has profound effects on the yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in dryland farming regions of the Loess Plateau in China. Mulching has proven to be an effective practice to increase crop yield, and possibly contribute to replenishing groundwater. This evaluation study collected and analyzed the data of 1849 observations published in 38 papers using meta-analysis to investigate effects of the mulching practices on wheat yield in terms of different rainfall and regions in comparison with conventional tillage. The main results of the study follow. The effects of the mulching practices were ranked in the order of RFM (ridge–furrow mulching) > MTMC (mulching with two materials combined) > MOM (mulching with other materials) > WSM (wheat straw mulching) > FM (flat mulching). The effects of the mulching practices at the different levels of rainfall during the wheat growing season were in the order: (< 150 mm) > (> 250 mm) > (150–250 mm). The effects of the mulching practices in the different regions were in the order of Henan > Shanxi > Shaanxi > Gansu. WSM, MTMC and FM performed better in improving wheat yield for rainfall of < 150, 150–250 and > 250 mm during the growing season, respectively. The wheat yield with FM, MTMC, MOM and MOM was higher than those with the other mulching practices in Shaanxi, Gansu, Henan and Shanxi. The wheat yield with RFM was 27.4% higher than that with FM, indicating that RFM was the most effective practice to improve wheat yield among all the practices. These findings have important implications for choosing appropriate crop field management to improve wheat yield.
机译:黄土高原旱地耕作方式的改进对水土保持的耕作方式对小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)的产量产生深远影响。覆盖已经被证明是提高作物产量的有效方法,并且可能有助于补充地下水。这项评估研究使用荟萃分析收集并分析了38篇论文中发表的1849个观测值的数据,以比较常规耕作方式,研究了不同降雨和地区下覆盖方式对小麦产量的影响。研究的主要结果如下。覆盖措施的效果按以下顺序排序:RFM(垄沟覆盖)> MTMC(两种材料一起覆盖)> MOM(其他材料一起覆盖)> WSM(小麦秸秆覆盖)> FM(平面覆盖)。小麦生长季节中不同降雨水平下的覆盖措施的影响顺序为(<150毫米)>(> 250毫米)>(150-250毫米)。覆盖措施在不同地区的影响程度依次为河南>山西>陕西>甘肃。在生长季,WSM,MTMC和FM分别在<150、150-250和> 250 mm的降雨量下,在提高小麦产量方面表现更好。 FM,MTMC,MOM和MOM处理的小麦单产高于陕西,甘肃,河南和山西等地的覆盖。 RFM的小麦单产比FM高27.4%,这表明RFM是所有实践中提高小麦单产的最有效方法。这些发现对选择合适的农田管理以提高小麦产量具有重要意义。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(10),5
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e0127402
  • 总页数 15
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-21 11:15:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号