首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Long-Term Experimental Case Study of the Ecological Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Invasive Plant Management in Achieving Conservation Goals: Bitou Bush Control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia
【2h】

A Long-Term Experimental Case Study of the Ecological Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Invasive Plant Management in Achieving Conservation Goals: Bitou Bush Control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia

机译:为实现保护目标而进行的有创植物管理的生态效益和成本效益的长期实验案例研究:澳大利亚东部Booderee国家公园的Bitou Bush管制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Invasive plant management is often justified in terms of conservation goals, yet progress is rarely assessed against these broader goals, instead focussing on short-term reductions of the invader as a measure of success. Key questions commonly remain unanswered including whether invader removal reverses invader impacts and whether management itself has negative ecosystem impacts. We addressed these knowledge gaps using a seven year experimental investigation of Bitou Bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata. Our case study took advantage of the realities of applied management interventions for Bitou Bush to assess whether it is a driver or passenger of environmental change, and quantified conservation benefits relative to management costs of different treatment regimes. Among treatments examined, spraying with herbicide followed by burning and subsequent re-spraying (spray-fire-spray) proved the most effective for reducing the number of individuals and cover of Bitou Bush. Other treatment regimes (e.g. fire followed by spraying, or two fires in succession) were less effective or even exacerbated Bitou Bush invasion. The spray-fire-spray regime did not increase susceptibility of treated areas to re-invasion by Bitou Bush or other exotic species. This regime significantly reduced plant species richness and cover, but these effects were short-lived. The spray-fire-spray regime was the most cost-effective approach to controlling a highly invasive species and facilitating restoration of native plant species richness to levels characteristic of uninvaded sites. We provide a decision tree to guide management, where recommended actions depend on the outcome of post-treatment monitoring and performance against objectives. Critical to success is avoiding partial treatments and treatment sequences that may exacerbate invasive species impacts. We also show the value of taking advantage of unplanned events, such as wildfires, to achieve management objectives at reduced cost.
机译:入侵性植物管理通常在保护目标方面是合理的,但很少根据这些更广泛的目标来评估进展,而将注意力集中在短期减少入侵者上作为成功的衡量标准。关键问题通常仍未得到解答,包括入侵者的清除是否会逆转入侵者的影响以及管理本身是否对生态系统产生负面影响。我们通过对Bitou Bush(Chrysanthemoides monilifera亚种)进行的为期7年的实验研究,解决了这些知识差距。 rotundata。我们的案例研究充分利用了比图·布什的应用管理干预措施的实际情况,以评估它是环境变化的驱动者还是乘客,并量化了相对于不同处理方案的管理成本的保护收益。在所检查的处理方法中,事实证明,喷洒除草剂,燃烧后再喷洒(喷火喷洒)对减少Bitou Bush的人数和掩盖最为有效。其他处理方式(例如先喷火后喷火,或连续两次喷火)效果较差,甚至加剧了比图·布什的入侵。喷火喷雾制度并没有增加被治疗的地区对Bitou Bush或其他外来物种再次入侵的敏感性。这种制度大大降低了植物物种的丰富度和覆盖率,但是这些影响是短暂的。喷洒-喷洒制度是控制高入侵物种并促进将原生植物物种的丰富度恢复到未受侵害地点特征水平的最具成本效益的方法。我们提供决策树来指导管理,其中建议的措施取决于治疗后监测的结果和目标的绩效。成功的关键是避免可能会加剧入侵物种影响的部分治疗和治疗顺序。我们还展示了利用意外事件(例如野火)以降低的成本实现管理目标的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号