首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Microinterventions Targeting Regulatory Focus and Regulatory Fit Selectively Reduce Dysphoric and Anxious Mood
【2h】

Microinterventions Targeting Regulatory Focus and Regulatory Fit Selectively Reduce Dysphoric and Anxious Mood

机译:针对监管重点和监管契机的微干预措施有选择地减少了烦躁和焦虑的情绪

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Depression and generalized anxiety, separately and as comorbid states, continue to represent a significant public health challenge. Current cognitive-behavioral treatments are clearly beneficial but there remains a need for continued development of complementary interventions. This manuscript presents two proof-of-concept studies, in analog samples, of “microinterventions” derived from regulatory focus and regulatory fit theories and targeting dysphoric and anxious symptoms. In Study 1, participants with varying levels of dysphoric and/or anxious mood were exposed to a brief intervention either to increase or to reduce engagement in personal goal pursuit, under the hypothesis that dysphoria indicates under-engagement of the promotion system whereas anxiety indicates over-engagement of the prevention system. In Study 2, participants with varying levels of dysphoric and/or anxious mood received brief training in counterfactual thinking, under the hypothesis that inducing individuals in a state of promotion failure to generate subtractive counterfactuals for past failures (a non-fit) will lessen their dejection/depression-related symptoms, whereas inducing individuals in a state of prevention failure to generate additive counterfactuals for past failures (a non-fit) will lessen their agitation/anxiety-related symptoms. In both studies, we observed discriminant patterns of reduction in distress consistent with the hypothesized links between dysfunctional states of the two motivational systems and dysphoric versus anxious symptoms.
机译:抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症(分别为合并症)继续代表着重大的公共卫生挑战。当前的认知行为治疗显然是有益的,但是仍然需要继续发展补充性干预措施。该手稿在模拟样本中提出了两项​​关于“微干预”的概念验证研究,这些微干预源自监管重点和监管适应理论,并针对烦躁不安和焦虑症状。在研究1中,烦躁不安表示促进系统参与不足,而焦虑症则表示过度兴奋,假设参与者的焦虑和/或焦虑情绪有所不同,他们可能会接受短暂干预以增加或减少对个人目标追求的参与-参与预防系统。在研究2中,具有不同程度的烦躁和/或焦虑情绪的参与者接受了关于反事实思维的简短培训,其假设是,诱使处于提升失败状态的个人针对过去的失败(不适合)产生减法反事实会减少他们的反事实。与抑郁/抑郁相关的症状,而诱导处于预防状态的个人针对过去的失败(不适合)而产生累加反事实将减轻他们的焦虑/焦虑相关症状。在两项研究中,我们观察到了痛苦减轻的判别模式,这与两个动机系统的功能障碍状态与烦躁不安和焦虑症状之间的假设联系相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号