首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Biomechanical Comparison of Shorts With Different Pads
【2h】

Biomechanical Comparison of Shorts With Different Pads

机译:不同护垫短裤的生物力学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An intensive use of the bicycle may increase the risk of erectile dysfunction and the compression of the perineal area has been showed to be a major mechanism leading to sexual alterations compromising the quality of life. Manufacturers claim that pads contribute to increase cyclists perineal protection ensuring a high level of comfort.To investigate the influence of various cycling pads with regard to perineal protection and level of comfort.Nine club road cyclists rode 20 min on a drum simulator, located at the Nutrition and Exercise Physiology Laboratory, at a constant speed and gear ratio wearing the shorts with 3 cycling pads of different design and thickness: basic (BAS), intermediate (INT), and endurance (END). Kinematics and pressure data were recorded at min 5, 15, and 20 of the test using a motion capture system and a pressure sensor mat. The variables of interest were: 3-dimensional pelvis excursions, peak pressure, mean pressure, and vertical force. The comfort level was assessed with a ranking order based on the subjects’ perception after the 20-min trials and measuring the vertical ground reaction force under the anterior wheel as well as the length of the center of pressure (COP) trajectory on the saddle.Results showed that the vertical force and the average value of mean pressure on the saddle significantly decreased during the 20-min period of testing for BAS and END. Mean peak pressure on the corresponding perineal cyclist area significantly increased only for BAS during the 20-min period. Interestingly objective comfort indexes measured did not match cyclists subjective comfort evaluation.The lower capacity of BAS to reduce the peak pressure on the corresponding perineal area after 20 min of testing, together with its positive comfort evaluation, suggest that a balance between protection and perceived comfort should be taken into account in the choice of the pad. Hence, the quantitative approach of objective comfort indexes introduced in this study could be helpful for manufacturers in the development of their protective pads.
机译:大量使用自行车可能会增加勃起功能障碍的风险,并且会阴部区域的压迫已被证明是导致性改变影响生活质量的主要机制。制造商声称垫子有助于增加骑车人的会阴保护,从而确保较高的舒适度。要研究各种自行车垫对会阴保护和舒适度的影响。九名俱乐部道路骑车人在鼓模拟器上骑了20分钟,该模拟器位于营养与运动生理学实验室,以恒定的速度和传动比,穿着带有3个不同设计和厚度的自行车垫的短裤:基本(BAS),中级(INT)和耐力(END)。使用运动捕捉系统和压力传感器垫在测试的第5、15和20分钟记录运动学和压力数据。感兴趣的变量是:3维骨盆偏移,峰值压力,平均压力和垂直力。在20分钟的试验后,根据受试者的感知程度,通过排名顺序评估舒适度,并测量前轮下的垂直地面反作用力以及鞍座上压力中心(COP)轨迹的长度。结果表明,在测试BAS和END的20分钟内,垂直力和平均鞍座平均压力值明显降低。仅在20分钟内,BAS的相应会阴骑自行车者区域的平均峰值压力才显着增加。有趣的是,所测量的客观舒适度指标与骑车人的主观舒适度评价不符。在20分钟的测试后,BAS降低相应会阴区域峰值压力的能力较低,加上其积极的舒适度评价,表明保护与感觉舒适度之间达到了平衡选择垫子时应考虑到这一点。因此,本研究中引入的客观舒适度指标的定量方法可能对制造商开发防护垫有所帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号