首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Effects of Different Training Backgrounds on VO2 Responses to All-Out and Supramaximal Constant-Velocity Running Bouts
【2h】

The Effects of Different Training Backgrounds on VO2 Responses to All-Out and Supramaximal Constant-Velocity Running Bouts

机译:不同训练背景对全速和超最大恒速跑步比赛VO2响应的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To investigate the impact of different training backgrounds on pulmonary oxygen uptake (V̇O2) responses during all-out and supramaximal constant-velocity running exercises, nine sprinters (SPRs) and eight endurance runners (ENDs) performed an incremental test for maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) assessment and two supramaximal running exercises (1-min all-out test and constant-velocity exercise). The V̇O2 responses were continuously determined during the tests (K4b2, Cosmed, Italy). A mono-exponential function was used to describe the V̇O2 onset kinetics during constant-velocity test at 110%MAV, while during 1-min all-out test the peak of V̇O2 (V̇O2peak), the time to achieve the V̇O2peak (tV̇O2peak) and the V̇O2 decrease at last of the test was determined to characterize the V̇O2 response. During constant-velocity exercise, ENDs had a faster V̇O2 kinetics than SPRs (12.7 ± 3.0 vs. 19.3 ± 5.6 s; p < 0.001). During the 1-min all-out test, ENDs presented slower tV̇O2peak than SPRs (40.6 ± 6.8 and 28.8 ± 6.4 s, respectively; p = 0.002) and had a similar V̇O2peak relative to the V̇O2max (88 ± 8 and 83 ± 6%, respectively; p = 0.157). Finally, SPRs was the only group that presented a V̇O2 decrease in the last half of the test (-1.8 ± 2.3 and 3.5 ± 2.3 ml.kg-1.min-1, respectively; p < 0.001). In summary, SPRs have a faster V̇O2 response when maximum intensity is required and a high maximum intensity during all-out running exercise seems to lead to a higher decrease in V̇O2 in the last part of the exercise.
机译:为了研究不同训练背景对全速和超最大恒速跑步运动过程中肺氧吸收(V̇O2)反应的影响,九名短跑运动员(SPR)和八名耐力赛跑者(END)对最大有氧运动速度(MAV)进行了增量测试)评估和两次超最大跑步锻炼(1分钟全力测试和恒速锻炼)。在测试期间(意大利科斯梅德的K4 b2 )不断确定V̇O2响应。单指数函数用于描述在110%MAV的恒速测试过程中V̇O2的动力学,而在1分钟全力测试期间,V̇O2的峰值(V̇O2peak),达到V̇O2peak的时间(tV̇O2peak)和确定测试最后的V̇O2下降以表征V̇O2响应。在恒速运动中,ENDs的V̇O2动力学比SPRs快(12.7±3.0对19.3±5.6 s; p <0.001)。在1分钟的全力测试中,ENDs的tV̇O2peak较SPR慢(分别为40.6±6.8和28.8±6.4 s; p = 0.002),并且相对于V̇O2max而言,V̇O2peak相似(88±8和83±6%) ,分别为p = 0.157)。最后,SPR是在测试的后半段中唯一出现V̇O2降低的组(-1.8±2.3和3.5±2.3 ml.kg -1 .min -1 分别; p <0.001)。总而言之,当需要最大强度时,SPR具有更快的V̇O2响应,而在全面跑步运动中,最高强度似乎会导致在运动的最后部分中V̇O2的下降幅度更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号