首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Molecular Systematics of the Cape Parrot (Poicephalus robustus): Implications for Taxonomy and Conservation
【2h】

Molecular Systematics of the Cape Parrot (Poicephalus robustus): Implications for Taxonomy and Conservation

机译:开普鹦鹉(Poicephalusrobus)的分子系统学:对分类学和保护意义。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The taxonomic position of the Cape Parrot (Poicephalus robustus robustus) has been the focus of much debate. A number of authors suggest that the Cape Parrot should be viewed as a distinct species separate from the other two P. robustus subspecies (P. r. fuscicollis and P. r. suahelicus). These recommendations were based on morphological, ecological, and behavioural assessments. In this study we investigated the validity of these recommendations using multilocus DNA analyses. We genotyped 138 specimens from five Poicephalus species (P. cryptoxanthus, P. gulielmi, P. meyeri, P. robustus, and P. rueppellii) using 11 microsatellite loci. Additionally, two mitochondrial (cytochrome oxidase I gene and 16S ribosomal RNA) and one nuclear intron (intron 7 of the β-fibrinogen gene) markers were amplified and sequenced. Bayesian clustering analysis and pairwise FST analysis of microsatellite data identified P. r. robustus as genetically distinct from the other P. robustus subspecies. Phylogenetic and molecular clock analyses on sequence data also supported the microsatellite analyses, placing P. r. robustus in a distinct clade separate from the other P. robustus subspecies. Molecular clock analysis places the most recent common ancestor between P. r. robustus and P. r. fuscicollis / P. r. suahelicus at 2.13 to 2.67 million years ago. Our results all support previous recommendations to elevate the Cape Parrot to species level. This will facilitate better planning and implementation of international and local conservation management strategies for the Cape Parrot.
机译:海角鹦鹉(Poicephalusrobususrobusus)的分类位置一直是许多争论的焦点。许多作者认为,海角鹦鹉应被视为与其他两个鲁棒对虾亚种(P. r。fuscicollis和P. r。suahelicus)不同的物种。这些建议基于形态,生态和行为评估。在这项研究中,我们使用多基因座DNA分析调查了这些建议的有效性。我们对来自5种Poicephalus(P. cryptoxanthus,P。gulielmi,P。meyeri, P robustus P 。)的138个标本进行了基因分型。 em> rueppellii )使用11个微卫星基因座。此外,扩增并测序了两个线粒体(细胞色素氧化酶I基因和16S核糖体RNA)和一个核内含子(β-纤维蛋白原基因的7号内含子)标记。贝叶斯聚类分析和微卫星数据的成对FST分析确定了 P r robustus 在遗传上与其他 P 不同。 robustus 亚种。对序列数据的系统发育和分子时钟分析也支持微卫星分析,将 P 置于位置。 r robustus 位于与其他 P 不同的分支中。 robustus 亚种。分子时钟分析将最近的共同祖先置于 P 之间。 r robustus P r fuscicollis / P r 。 suahelicus 在2.13到267万年前。我们的结果均支持先前提出的将鹦鹉角提升至物种水平的建议。这将有助于更好地计划和实施鹦鹉角国际和地方保护管理战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号