首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >So Close to a Deal: Spatial-Distance Cues Influence Economic Decision-Making in a Social Context
【2h】

So Close to a Deal: Spatial-Distance Cues Influence Economic Decision-Making in a Social Context

机译:如此接近达成协议:空间距离线索在社会环境中影响经济决策

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social distance (i.e., the degree of closeness to another person) affects the way humans perceive and respond to fairness during financial negotiations. Feeling close to someone enhances the acceptance of monetary offers. Here, we explored whether this effect also extends to the spatial domain. Specifically, using an iterated version of the Ultimatum Game in a within-subject design, we investigated whether different visual spatial distance-cues result in different rates of acceptance of otherwise identical monetary offers. Study 1 found that participants accepted significantly more offers when they were cued with spatial closeness than when they were cued with spatial distance. Study 2 replicated this effect using identical procedures but different spatial-distance cues in an independent sample. Importantly, our results could not be explained by feelings of social closeness. Our results demonstrate that mere perceptions of spatial closeness produce analogous–but independent–effects to those of social closeness.
机译:社会距离(即与他人的亲密程度)会影响人们在金融谈判中对公平的感知和回应方式。亲近某人会增强人们接受货币报价的能力。在这里,我们探讨了这种影响是否也扩展到了空间领域。具体来说,在受试者内部设计中使用“最后通Game博弈”的迭代版本,我们调查了不同的视觉空间距离提示是否会导致接受其他相同货币报价的接受率不同。研究1发现,与空间距离​​提示相比,参与者在空间接近提示时接受的报价要多得多。研究2使用相同的程序,但在独立样本中使用不同的空间距离提示来复制此效果。重要的是,我们的结果无法用社会亲密感来解释。我们的结果表明,对空间亲密性的单纯感知会产生与社会亲密性相似但独立的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号