首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism
【2h】

The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism

机译:读心智测试:约400名患有自闭症的男女完全没有典型的性别差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (Eyes test) is an advanced test of theory of mind. Typical sex difference has been reported (i.e., female advantage). Individuals with autism show more difficulty than do typically developing individuals, yet it remains unclear how this is modulated by sex, as females with autism have been under-represented. Here in a large, non-male-biased sample we test for the effects of sex, diagnosis, and their interaction. The Eyes test (revised version) was administered online to 395 adults with autism (178 males, 217 females) and 320 control adults (152 males, 168 females). Two-way ANOVA showed a significant sex-by-diagnosis interaction in total correct score (F(1,711) = 5.090, p = 0.024, ηp 2 = 0.007) arising from a significant sex difference between control males and females (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.47), and an absence of a sex difference between males and females with autism (p = 0.907, d = 0.01); significant case-control differences were observed across sexes, with effect sizes of d = 0.35 in males and d = 0.69 in females. Group-difference patterns fit with the extreme-male-brain (EMB) theory predictions. Eyes test-Empathy Quotient and Eyes test-Autism Spectrum Quotient correlations were significant only in females with autism (r = 0.35, r = -0.32, respectively), but not in the other 3 groups. Support vector machine (SVM) classification based on response pattern across all 36 items classified autism diagnosis with a relatively higher accuracy for females (72.2%) than males (65.8%). Nevertheless, an SVM model trained within one sex generalized equally well when applied to the other sex. Performance on the Eyes test is a sex-independent phenotypic characteristic of adults with autism, reflecting sex-common social difficulties, and provides support for the EMB theory predictions for both males and females. Performance of females with autism differed from same-sex controls more than did that of males with autism. Females with autism also showed stronger coherence between self-reported dispositional traits and Eyes test performance than all other groups.
机译:“阅读眼中的思想”测试(眼睛测试)是对心理理论的高级测试。已经报道了典型的性别差异(即女性优势)。自闭症患者比一般发展中的个体表现出更大的困难,但目前尚不清楚这是如何通过性别调节的,因为自闭症女性的代表性不足。在这里,我们在一个大的,无男性偏见的样本中测试性别,诊断及其相互作用的影响。对395名患有自闭症的成年人(男性178名,女性217名)和320名对照成年人(152名男性,168名女性)进行了在线眼试验(修订版)。双向方差分析显示,在正确总评分中,性别之间的性别差异有统计学意义(F(1,711)= 5.090,p = 0.024,ηp 2 = 0.007),原因是对照组男性之间存在明显的性别差异男性和女性(p <0.001,科恩d = 0.47),自闭症男女之间没有性别差异(p = 0.907,d = 0.01);在性别上观察到显着的病例对照差异,男性的影响大小为d = 0.35,女性的影响大小为d = 0.69。群体差异模式符合极端男性大脑(EMB)理论的预测。仅自闭症女性的眼睛测验-Emphany商数和眼睛测验-自闭症谱商的相关性显着(分别为r = 0.35,r = -0.32),而在其他3组中则没有。支持向量机(SVM)基于所有36种自闭症诊断项目的响应模式进行分类,女性(72.2%)的准确性高于男性(65.8%)。然而,当应用于另一种性别时,在一种性别中训练的支持向量机模型可以很好地推广。 “对眼睛的表现”测试是自闭症成年人的性别独立表型特征,反映了性别常见的社会困难,并为男性和女性的EMB理论预测提供了支持。自闭症女性的表现与同性对照相比,自闭症男性的表现更多。自闭症女性的自我报告的性格特征与眼睛测试表现之间的连贯性也高于其他所有群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号