首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison of the Photosynthetic Yield of Cyanobacteria and Green Algae: Different Methods Give Different Answers
【2h】

Comparison of the Photosynthetic Yield of Cyanobacteria and Green Algae: Different Methods Give Different Answers

机译:蓝藻和绿藻光合产量的比较:不同的方法给出不同的答案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The societal importance of renewable carbon-based commodities and energy carriers has elicited a particular interest for high performance phototrophic microorganisms. Selection of optimal strains is often based on direct comparison under laboratory conditions of maximal growth rate or additional valued features such as lipid content. Instead of reporting growth rate in culture, estimation of photosynthetic efficiency (quantum yield of PSII) by pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorimetry is an often applied alternative method. Here we compared the quantum yield of PSII and the photonic yield on biomass for the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana 211-8K and the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Our data demonstrate that the PAM technique inherently underestimates the photosynthetic efficiency of cyanobacteria by rendering a high F0 and a low FM, specifically after the commonly practiced dark pre-incubation before a yield measurement. Yet when comparing the calculated biomass yield on light in continuous culture experiments, we obtained nearly equal values for both species. Using mutants of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, we analyzed the factors that compromise its PAM-based quantum yield measurements. We will discuss the role of dark respiratory activity, fluorescence emission from the phycobilisomes, and the Mehler-like reaction. Based on the above observations we recommend that PAM measurements in cyanobacteria are interpreted only qualitatively.
机译:可再生碳基商品和能量载体的社会重要性引起了对高性能光养微生物的特别关注。最佳菌株的选择通常基于在最大生长速率或其他有价值的特征(例如脂质含量)的实验室条件下的直接比较。通过报告脉冲幅度调制(PAM)荧光法估算光合作用效率(PSII的量子产率),而不是报告培养物中的生长速率,是一种经常使用的替代方法。在这里,我们比较了绿藻小球藻211-8K和蓝藻蓝藻SPPS的量子产率和生物量的光子产率。 PCC6803。我们的数据表明,PAM技术通过高F0和低FM固有地低估了蓝藻的光合作用效率,特别是在产量测量之前通常进行的黑暗预培养之后。然而,当在连续培养实验中比较计算得出的光生物量产量时,我们获得了两种物种几乎相等的值。使用变形囊藻的突变体。 PCC 6803,我们分析了影响其基于PAM的量子产率测量的因素。我们将讨论黑暗呼吸活动,藻胆体发出的荧光以及类似梅勒反应的作用。基于以上观察,我们建议仅对定性解释蓝细菌中的PAM测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号