首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Can money heal all wounds? Social exchange norm modulates the preference for monetary versus social compensation
【2h】

Can money heal all wounds? Social exchange norm modulates the preference for monetary versus social compensation

机译:钱可以治愈所有伤口吗?社会交流规范调节了对货币补偿与社会补偿的偏好

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Compensation is a kind of pro-social behavior that can restore a social relationship jeopardized by interpersonal transgression. The effectiveness of a certain compensation strategy (e.g., repaying money, sharing loss, etc.) may vary as a function of the social norm/relationship. Previous studies have shown that two types of norms (or relationships), monetary/exchange and social/communal, differentially characterize people’s appraisal of and response to social exchanges. In this study, we investigated how individual differences in preference for these norms affect individuals’ perception of others’ as well as the selection of their own reciprocal behaviors. In a two-phase experiment with interpersonal transgression, we asked the participant to perform a dot-estimation task with two partners who occasionally and unintentionally inflicted noise stimulation upon the participant (first phase). As compensation one partner gave money to the participant 80% of the time (the monetary partner) and the other bore the noise for the participant 80% of the time (the social partner). Results showed that the individuals’ preference for compensation (repaying money versus bearing noise) affected their relationship (exchange versus communal) with the partners adopting different compensation strategies: participants tended to form communal relationships and felt closer to the partner whose compensation strategy matched their own preference. The participants could be differentiated into a social group, who tended to form communal relationship with the social partner, and a monetary group, who tended to form communal relationship with the monetary partner. In the second phase of the experiment, when the participants became transgressors and were asked to compensate for their transgression with money, the social group offered more compensation to the social partners than to the monetary partners, while the monetary group compensated less than the social group in general and showed no difference in their offers to the monetary and social partners. These findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of compensation varies as a function of individuals’ preference for communal versus monetary norm and that monetary compensation alone does not heal all wounds.
机译:补偿是一种亲社会行为,可以恢复因人际交往而受到危害的社会关系。某些补偿策略(例如,还款,分担损失等)的有效性可能会根据社会规范/关系而变化。先前的研究表明,货币/交换和社会/社区这两种类型的规范(或关系)差异化地表征了人们对社会交流的评价和回应。在这项研究中,我们调查了个人对这些规范的偏好差异如何影响个人对他人的看法以及对自己的相互行为的选择。在一个两阶段的人际交往实验中,我们要求参与者与两个伙伴一起执行点估计任务,这两个伙伴会偶而无意地对参与者造成噪声刺激(第一阶段)。作为补偿,一个合伙人80%的时间向参与者(金钱合伙人)捐钱,另一方则为参与者80%的噪音(社会伙伴)讨价还价。结果表明,个人对补偿的偏好(偿还金钱与承担噪音)会影响他们与伴侣(采用交换策略)的关系(交换与社区):参与者倾向于建立社区关系,并且更接近与自己的补偿策略相匹配的伙伴偏爱。参与者可以分为趋向于与社会伙伴形成社区关系的社会群体和趋向于与货币伙伴形成社区关系的货币群体。在实验的第二阶段,当参与者成为违法者并被要求用金钱补偿其违法行为时,社会团体向社会伙伴提供的补偿要高于货币合作伙伴,而货币团体给予的补偿要少于社会团体。总体而言,他们对货币和社会伙伴的报价没有差异。这些发现表明,补偿的有效性随个人对公共准则和货币准则的偏爱而变化,并且仅货币补偿并不能治愈所有伤口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号