首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Efficacy of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Refractory Angina on Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Class
【2h】

Efficacy of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Refractory Angina on Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Class

机译:慢性难治性心绞痛患者增强体外反搏对加拿大心血管学会(CCS)心绞痛类别的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A growing number of patients with chronic artery disease suffer from angina, despite the optimal medical management (ie, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and long-acting nitrates) and revascularization. Currently, enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy has been verified as a noninvasive, safe therapy for refractory angina. The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of EECP in patients with chronic refractory angina according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class.We identified systematic literature through MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register Database, and the ClinicalTrials. gov Website from 1990 to 2015. Studies were considered eligible if they were prospective and reported data on CCS class before and after EECP treatment. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of EECP therapy by at least 1 CCS angina class improvement, and proportion along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Statistical heterogeneity was calculated by I2 statistic and the Q statistic. Sensitivity analysis was addressed to test the influence of trials on the overall pooled results. Subgroup analysis was applied to explore potential reasons for heterogeneity.Eighteen studies were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed 85% of patients underwent EECP had a reduction by at least one CCS class (95%CI 0.81–0.88, I2 = 58.5%, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients enrolled at primarily different studies with chronic heart failure (CHF) improved by at least 1 CCS class was about 84% after EECP (95%CI 0.81–0.88, I2 = 32.7%, P = 0.1668). After 3 large studies were excluded, the pooled proportion was 82% (95%CI 0.79–0.86, I2 = 18%, P = 0.2528). Funnel plot indicated that some asymmetry while the Begg and Egger bias statistic showed no publication bias (P = 0.1495 and 0.2859, respectively).Our study confirmed that EECP provided an effective treatment for patients who were unresponsive to medical management and/or invasive therapy. However, the long-term benefits of EECP therapy needed further studies to evaluate in the management of chronic refractory angina.
机译:尽管有最佳的药物管理(例如,β受体阻滞剂,钙通道阻滞剂和长效硝酸盐)和血运重建,但越来越多的慢性动脉疾病患者仍患有心绞痛。目前,增强的外部反搏(EECP)疗法已被证实为难治性心绞痛的一种非侵入性,安全疗法。该研究旨在根据加拿大心血管学会(CCS)心绞痛类别评估EECP在慢性难治性心绞痛患者中的疗效。我们通过MEDLINE,EMBASE,Cochrane临床试验注册数据库和ClinicalTrials鉴定了系统文献。从1990年到2015年的官方网站。如果研究具有前瞻性并报告了EECP治疗前后CCS类别的数据,则认为该研究合格。进行荟萃分析,以评估至少1例CCS心绞痛改善程度对EECP治疗的疗效,并计算比例和95%置信区间(CI)。统计异质性由I 2 统计量和Q统计量计算得出。进行敏感性分析以测试试验对总体汇总结果的影响。亚组分析被用于探索异质性的潜在原因。我们的荟萃分析纳入了18项研究。汇总分析显示,接受EECP的患者中有85%的患者至少降低了一种CCS分类(95%CI 0.81–0.88,I 2 = 58.5%,P <0.001)。参加主要不同研究的慢性心力衰竭(CHF)至少增加1级CCS的患者比例在EECP后约为84%(95%CI 0.81–0.88,I 2 = 32.7%, P = 0.1668)。排除3项大型研究后,合并比例为82%(95%CI 0.79–0.86,I 2 = 18%,P = 0.2528)。漏斗图表明存在一些不对称性,而Begg和Egger偏倚统计数据没有显示偏倚(分别为P = 0.1495和0.2859)。我们的研究证实EECP为对药物治疗和/或侵入性治疗无反应的患者提供了有效的治疗方法。但是,EECP治疗的长期益处需要进一步研究,以评估慢性难治性心绞痛的治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号