首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Comparison on Response and Dissolution Rates Between Ursodeoxycholic Acid Alone or in Combination With Chenodeoxycholic Acid for Gallstone Dissolution According to Stone Density on CT Scan
【2h】

Comparison on Response and Dissolution Rates Between Ursodeoxycholic Acid Alone or in Combination With Chenodeoxycholic Acid for Gallstone Dissolution According to Stone Density on CT Scan

机译:CT扫描根据石蜡密度比较熊去氧胆酸单独或与鹅去氧胆酸合用对胆汁溶解的反应和溶出速率的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Medical dissolution of gallstone is usually performed on radiolucent gallstones in a functioning gallbladder. However, absence of visible gallstone on plain abdominal x-ray does not always preclude calcification. This study aims to compare the response and dissolution rates between ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) alone or in combination with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) according to stone density on computed tomography (CT) scan.A total of 126 patients underwent dissolution therapy with either UDCA alone or combination of CDCA and UDCA (CNU) from December 2010 to March 2014 at Korea University Ansan Hospital. In the end, 81 patients (CNU group = 44, UDCA group = 37) completed dissolution therapy for 6 months. Dissolution rate (percentage reduction in the gallstone volume) and response to therapy (complete dissolution or partial dissolution defined as reduction in stone volume of >50%) were compared between the 2 groups. Dissolution and response rates of sludge was also compared between the 2 groups.The overall response rate was 50.6% (CNU group 43.2% vs UDCA group 59.5%, P = 0.14), and the overall dissolution rate was 48.34% (CNU group 41.5% vs UDCA group 56.5%, P = 0.13). When analyzed according to stone density, response rate was 33.3%, 87.1%, 30.0%, and 6.2% for hypodense, isodense, hyperdense, and calcified stones, respectively. Response rate (85.7% vs 88.2%, P = 0.83) and dissolution rate (81.01% vs 85.38%, P = 0.17) of isodense stones were similar between CNU and UDCA group. When only sludge was considered, the overall response rate was 87.5% (CNU group 71.4% vs UDCA group 94.1%, P = 0.19), and the overall dissolution rate was 85.42% (CNU group 67.9% vs UDCA group 92.7%, P = 0.23).Patients with isodense gallstones and sludge showed much better response to dissolution therapy with CNU and UDCA showing comparable efficacy. Therefore, CT scan should be performed before medication therapy if stone dissolution is intended.
机译:胆结石的医学溶解通常在功能正常的胆囊中对射线可透过的胆结石进行。但是,在普通腹部X射线检查中没有可见的胆结石并不总是能够排除钙化。这项研究的目的是根据CT扫描上的结石密度比较熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)或与鹅去氧胆酸(CDCA)的反应和溶出率。总共126例患者单独接受UDCA溶出治疗于2010年12月至2014年3月在高丽大学安山医院CDCD和UDCA(CNU)合并使用。最后,有81名患者(CNU组44,UDCA组37)完成了6个月的溶出治疗。比较两组的溶出率(胆结石体积减少百分比)和对治疗的反应(完全溶出或部分溶出定义为结石体积减少> 50%)。还比较了两组的污泥溶解度和缓解率,总缓解率为50.6%(CNU组为43.2%,UDCA组为59.5%,P = 0.14),总溶解率为48.34%(CNU组为41.5%)。 vs UDCA组56.5%,P = 0.13)。根据结石密度进行分析时,低密度,等密度,高密度和钙化结石的响应率分别为33.3%,87.1%,30.0%和6.2%。 CNU组和UDCA组的异石结石缓解率(85.7%vs 88.2%,P = 0.83)和溶出率(81.01%vs 85.38%,P = 0.17)相似。仅考虑污泥时,总缓解率为87.5%(CNU组为71.4%,而UDCA组为94.1%,P = 0.19),总溶出率为85.42%(CNU组为67.9%,而UDCA组为92.7%,P = 0.23)。具有等密度胆结石和污泥的患者对CNU和UDCA溶出度疗法的疗效要好得多。因此,如果打算溶解结石,应在药物治疗之前进行CT扫描。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号