首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Moderate Effects of Same-Sex Legislation on Dependent Employer-Based Insurance Coverage among Sexual Minorities
【2h】

Moderate Effects of Same-Sex Legislation on Dependent Employer-Based Insurance Coverage among Sexual Minorities

机译:同性立法对基于性雇主的基于性少数族裔的覆盖范围有限

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A difference-in-difference approach was used to compare the effects of same-sex domestic partnership, civil union, and marriage policies on same- and different-sex partners who could have benefitted from their partners’ employer-based insurance (EBI) coverage. Same-sex partners had 78% lower odds (ME=-21%) of having EBI compared to different-sex partners, adjusting for socioeconomic and health-related factors. Same-sex partners living in states that recognized same-sex marriage or domestic partnership had 89% greater odds of having EBI compared to those in states that did not recognize same-sex unions (ME=5%). The impact of same-sex legislation on increasing take-up of dependent EBI coverage among lesbians, gay men, and bisexual individuals (LGBs) was modest, and domestic partnership legislation was equally as effective as same-sex marriage in increasing same-sex partner EBI coverage. Extending dependent EBI coverage to same-sex partners can mitigate gaps in coverage for a segment of the LGB population but will not eliminate them.
机译:使用差异差异方法来比较同性家庭伙伴关系,公民联盟和婚姻政策对可能从其合伙人的雇主保险中受益的同性和异性伴侣的影响。调整了社会经济和健康相关因素后,同性伴侣的EBI几率比异性伴侣低78%(ME = -21%)。与那些不承认同性婚姻的州(ME = 5%)相比,生活在承认同性婚姻或家庭伴侣的州中的同性伴侣拥有EBI的几率高89%。同性立法对增加女同性恋者,男同性恋者和双性恋者(LGB)对独立EBI覆盖率的影响不大,在增加同性伴侣方面,家庭合伙立法与同性婚姻同样有效。 EBI覆盖范围。将依存的EBI覆盖范围扩大到同性伙伴可以减轻LGB人群的覆盖范围差距,但并不能消除它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号