首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Does High-Dose Cytarabine Cause More Fungal Infection in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Consolidation Therapy
【2h】

Does High-Dose Cytarabine Cause More Fungal Infection in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Consolidation Therapy

机译:大剂量阿糖胞苷对合并治疗的急性髓细胞白血病患者是否会引起更多的真菌感染

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) remains as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Here, we report the subgroup analysis of China Assessment of Antifungal Therapy in Haematological Disease (CAESAR) study to evaluate the risk of IFI in patients with AML in 1st remission receiving high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) as consolidation. A total of 638 patients with AML in 1st complete remission were selected from the database. Among them, 130 patients received HiDAC alone with total dose of 2–3 g/m2 × 6 while 508 patients received multiple-agent combination chemotherapy (multiagent chemo group). The patients’ characteristics were generally not different but more patients in HiDAC group had peripherally inserted central catheter (61.5% vs 44.5%, P = 0.002). The median duration of neutropenia was 8.0 days in both HiDAC (2–20) and multiagent chemo group (2–28). Number of patients with prolonged neutropenia (>14 days) tended to be more in multiagent chemo group but not significant different (16.3% vs 8.8%, respectively). There was no significant difference between 2 groups in persistent neutropenic fever (40.8% vs 33.1%), antifungal treatment (11.5% vs 11.4%), and incidence of proven/probable IFI (4 probable in HiDAC vs 1 proven/4 probable in multiagent chemo, P = 0.35) or possible IFI. As to the clinical outcome in terms of duration of hospitalization and death in remission, there was a trend of shorter duration of hospitalization in HiDAC (19 days, 3–70) compare to multiagent chemo group (21 days, 1–367, P = 0.057) while no death documented in HiDAC group and only 2 patients died in the multiagent chemo group (0.4%). As to risk factors associated with IFI in all 638 patients, there was a trend of more IFI in patients with severe neutropenia (3.0%, P = 0.089) and previous history of IFI (3.85%, P = 0.086) while the antifungal prophylaxis was not associated significantly reduced IFI. Overall, our data support the perception that HiDAC alone as consolidation in first remission AML patients was well tolerated and not associated with increased hematological toxicity and IFI than conventional combination chemotherapy. Antifungal prophylaxis may not necessary except for patients with previous history of IFI.
机译:侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)仍然是急性骨髓性白血病(AML)患者发病和死亡的重要原因。在这里,我们报告了《中国血液病抗真菌治疗评估》(CAESAR)研究的亚组分析,以评估接受大剂量阿糖胞苷(HiDAC)合并治疗的1例AML患者的IFI风险。从数据库中选择了总共638例第一次完全缓解的AML患者。其中130例仅接受HiDAC,总剂量为2–3μg / m 2 ×6,而508例接受了多药联合化疗(多药化疗组)。患者的特征一般没有差异,但HiDAC组中有更多患者在中心插入了中心导管(61.5%vs 44.5%,P = 0.002)。 HiDAC(2–20)和多药化疗组(2–28)的中性粒细胞减少症的中位持续时间均为8.0天。在多药化疗组中,中性粒细胞减少症(> 14天)延长的患者人数倾向于更多,但差异无统计学意义(分别为16.3%和8.8%)。两组之间的持续中性粒细胞减少症发热(40.8%比33.1%),抗真菌治疗(11.5%比11.4%)和IFI的证实/可能发生率(HiDAC中4可能对多药中1/4可能发生)之间无显着差异。 ,P = 0.35)或可能的IFI。关于住院时间和缓解期死亡方面的临床结果,与多药化疗组(21天,1-367)相比,HiDAC的住院时间(19天,3–70)有缩短的趋势。 0.057),而HiDAC组无死亡记录,多药化疗组仅2例死亡(0.4%)。至于所有638例患者中与IFI相关的危险因素,严重中性粒细胞减少症(3.0%,P = 0.089)和既往有IFI病史(3.85%,P = 0.086)的患者中有更多的IFI趋势,而抗真菌药物的预防是不相关的IFI明显减少。总体而言,我们的数据支持以下观念:与常规联合化疗相比,HiDAC单独作为首发缓解AML患者的巩固治疗耐受性良好,并且与血液毒性和IFI升高无关。除非有IFI病史的患者,否则可能不需要进行抗真菌预防。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号