首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Staying Connected on the Road: A Comparison of Different Types of Smart Phone Use in a Driving Simulator
【2h】

Staying Connected on the Road: A Comparison of Different Types of Smart Phone Use in a Driving Simulator

机译:在道路上保持联系:驾驶模拟器中不同类型智能手机的使用比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous research on smart phone use while driving has primarily focused on phone calls and texting. Drivers are now increasingly using their phone for other activities during driving, in particular social media, which have different cognitive demands. The present study compared the effects of four different smart phone tasks on car-following performance in a driving simulator. Phone tasks were chosen that vary across two factors: interaction medium (text vs image) and task pacing (self-paced vs experimenter-paced) and were as follows: Text messaging with the experimenter (text/other-paced), reading Facebook posts (text/self-paced), exchanging photos with the experimenter via Snapchat (image, experimenter -paced), and viewing updates on Instagram (image, experimenter -paced). Drivers also performed a driving only baseline. Brake reaction times (BRTs) were significantly greater in the text-based conditions (Mean = 1.16 s) as compared to both the image-based conditions (Mean = 0.92 s) and the baseline (0.88 s). There was no significant difference between BRTs in the image-based and baseline conditions and there was no significant effect of task-pacing. Similar results were obtained for Time Headway variability. These results are consistent with the picture superiority effect found in memory research and suggest that image-based interfaces could provide safer ways to “stay connected” while driving than text-based interfaces.
机译:先前有关驾驶时使用智能手机的研究主要集中在电话和短信方面。现在,驾驶员在驾驶过程中越来越多地使用手机进行其他活动,尤其是社交媒体,这些活动具有不同的认知需求。本研究在驾驶模拟器中比较了四种不同的智能手机任务对跟车性能的影响。选择的电话任务在两个因素之间有所不同:交互介质(文本与图像)和任务节奏(自定进度与实验者定进度),具体如下:与实验者进行短信(文本/其他定速),阅读Facebook帖子(文本/自定节奏),通过Snapchat与实验者交换照片(图像,实验者定节奏),以及在Instagram上查看更新(图像,实验者定节奏)。驾驶员还执行了仅行驶基准。与基于图像的条件(平均值= 0.92 s)和基准的条件(平均值= 0.82 s)相比,基于文本的条件(平均值= 1.16 s)中的制动反应时间(BRT)明显更长。在基于图像的基准条件和基准条件下,BRT之间没有显着差异,并且任务进度没有显着影响。对于Time Headway变异性也获得了类似的结果。这些结果与内存研究中发现的图片优势相吻合,并表明基于图像的界面可以提供比基于文本的界面更安全的“保持连接”方式。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Jaimie McNabb; Rob Gray;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(11),2
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e0148555
  • 总页数 12
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号