首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Assessing Strain Mapping by Electron Backscatter Diffraction and Confocal Raman Microscopy Using Wedge-indented Si
【2h】

Assessing Strain Mapping by Electron Backscatter Diffraction and Confocal Raman Microscopy Using Wedge-indented Si

机译:通过电子反向散射衍射和使用楔形凹痕硅的共焦拉曼显微镜评估应变图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The accuracy of electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) for small-scale strain mapping are assessed using the multi-axial strain field surrounding a wedge indentation in Si as a test vehicle. The strain field is modeled using finite element analysis (FEA) that is adapted to the near-indentation surface profile measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The assessment consists of (1) direct experimental comparisons of strain and deformation and (2) comparisons in which the modeled strain field is used as an intermediate step. Direct experimental methods (1) consist of comparisons of surface elevation and gradient measured by AFM and EBSD and of Raman shifts measured and predicted by CRM and EBSD, respectively. Comparisons that utilize the combined FEA-AFM model (2) consist of predictions of distortion, strain, and rotation for comparison with EBSD measurements and predictions of Raman shift for comparison with CRM measurements. For both EBSD and CRM, convolution of measurements in depth-varying strain fields is considered. The interconnected comparisons suggest that EBSD was able to provide an accurate assessment of the wedge indentation deformation field to within the precision of the measurements, approximately 2 × 10−4 in strain. CRM was similarly precise, but was limited in accuracy to several times this value.
机译:使用硅中楔形凹痕周围的多轴应变场作为测试工具,评估了电子背散射衍射(EBSD)和共焦拉曼显微镜(CRM)用于小尺寸应变映射的准确性。使用有限元分析(FEA)对应变场进行建模,该有限元分析适合于通过原子力显微镜(AFM)测量的近压痕表面轮廓。评估包括(1)应变和变形的直接实验比较,以及(2)将建模的应变场用作中间步骤的比较。直接实验方法(1)包括比较分别由AFM和EBSD测量的表面高度和坡度以及由CRM和EBSD测量和预测的拉曼位移。利用组合的FEA-AFM模型(2)进行的比较包括与EBSD测量结果进行比较的变形,应变和旋转预测,以及与CRM测量结果进行比较的拉曼位移预测。对于EBSD和CRM,都应考虑深度变化应变场中的卷积测量。相互关联的比较表明,EBSD能够在测量精度范围内(约2×10 −4 应变)准确评估楔形压痕变形场。 CRM同样精确,但是其精确度被限制为该值的几倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号