首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Contrasting Partners’ Traits of Generalized and Specialized Species in Flower-Visitation Networks
【2h】

Contrasting Partners’ Traits of Generalized and Specialized Species in Flower-Visitation Networks

机译:花卉访问网络中合作伙伴的广义和特殊物种的特征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Much ecological research has focused on trying to understand why species are generalized or specialized in their interactions and how networks develop in a certain environment. It is now well known that traits such as phenology and abundance of a species are important determinants of its generalization level (i.e., number of different interactions or links to other species). Less information is available, however, on whether generalized and specialized species differ in particular traits of their interacting partners. Such partners might differ, for instance, in abundance and/or in the diversity of functional groups they belong to. Moreover, species might exhibit shifts through time (e.g., flowering season) in their partners’ traits, though we know close to nothing on whether these changes do indeed occur. Assessing how such network links in both types of species are established is important for a better understanding of how different types of disturbance can affect community dynamics. Using data from four quantitative flower-visitation networks and independent measures of flower availability obtained when recording interactions, we test for such differences between species which have been previously categorized according to two specialization indexes: (1) number of partners (links), also named linkage level; this is a qualitative index and (2) complementary specialization d’, named here selectiveness level; this is a quantitative index. We found that: (1) species with low linkage levels mainly interact with common species in the community whereas generalized species interact with a greater heterogeneity of partner’s abundances and functional richness, (2) both selective and opportunistic species (with high and low d’, respectively) interact with a similarly high functional richness (number of functional groups or families) of partners, and (3) generalized species are the only ones showing shifts along the season in their partners’ traits, driven by changes in community species composition. The risk of extinction in front of a disturbance is generally expected to be highest for specialized species (with few partners) and selective species (which visit non-abundant or scarce partners). However, our findings show that by linking to abundant and/or to functionally diverse partners, respectively, these species may be maintained in the community and be less vulnerable to disturbances.
机译:许多生态学研究都集中于试图理解为什么物种在相互作用中被普遍化或专门化,以及网络在特定环境中如何发展。众所周知,物种的物候特性和丰富度是决定其泛化水平的重要决定因素(即与其他物种的不同相互作用或联系的数量)。但是,关于广义物种和专门物种在其相互作用伙伴的特定性状上是否不同的信息很少。这样的合作伙伴可能在例如丰富度和/或它们所属的功能组的多样性方面有所不同。此外,物种可能会随着时间的推移(例如开花季节)表现出其伴侣特征的变化,尽管我们几乎不知道这些变化是否确实发生。评估如何在两种类型的物种中建立这种网络链接对于更好地了解不同类型的干扰如何影响群落动态非常重要。使用来自四个定量花卉访问网络的数据以及记录相互作用时获得的独立的花卉可用性度量,我们测试了物种之间的这种差异,这些差异先前已根据两个专业化指标进行了分类:(1)伙伴数(链接),也称为链接级别;这是定性指标和(2)互补专业化d’,在这里称为选择性水平;这是一个定量指标。我们发现:(1)具有较低连锁水平的物种主要与社区中的常见物种相互作用,而广义物种则与伙伴的丰富度和功能丰富度的更大异质性相互作用,(2)选择性物种和机会物种(具有高和低d' )分别与同伴具有类似功能的丰富度(功能群或家族的数量)相互作用,并且(3)在物种的季节中,由于群落物种组成的变化而导致其配偶性状发生变化的唯一物种是广义物种。对于特殊物种(很少有伴侣)和选择性物种(拜访数量不多或稀缺的伴侣),通常预期在干扰之前灭绝的风险最高。但是,我们的发现表明,通过分别与丰富和/或功能多样的合作伙伴建立联系,这些物种可能会在社区中得到维持,并且不易受到干扰。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(11),3
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 e0150824
  • 总页数 13
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号