首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Prior knowledge or freedom of interpretation? A critical look at a recently published classification of novel Zn binding sites
【2h】

Prior knowledge or freedom of interpretation? A critical look at a recently published classification of novel Zn binding sites

机译:先验知识或解释自由?批判性地看一下最近出版的新型锌结合位点的分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a recently published paper [Yao, S., Flight, R.M., Rouchka, E.C. & Moseley, H.N. (2015). Proteins >83, 1470–1487] the authors propose novel Zn coordination patterns in protein structures, apparently discovered using an unprejudiced approach to the information collected in the Protein data Bank (PDB), which they advocate as superior to the prior-knowledge-informed paradigm. In our assessment of those propositions we demonstrate here that most, if not all, of the ‘new’ coordination geometries are fictitious, as they are based on incorrectly interpreted protein crystal structures, which in themselves are often not error-free. The flaws of interpretation include partial or wrong Zn sites, missed or wrong ligands, ignored crystal symmetry and ligands, etc. In conclusion, we warn against using this and similar meta-analyses that ignore chemical and crystallographic knowledge, and emphasize the importance of safeguarding structural databases against bad apples.
机译:在最近发表的论文中[Yao,S.,Flight,R.M.,Rouchka,E.C.&Moseley,H.N.(2015)。蛋白质> 83 ,1470–1487]作者提出了蛋白质结构中新颖的Zn配位模式,显然是通过对蛋白质数据库(PDB)中所收集信息的不偏不倚的方法发现的,他们主张优于先验知识的范式。在我们对这些命题的评估中,我们在这里证明,大多数(如果不是全部)“新”配位几何都是虚构的,因为它们基于错误解释的蛋白质晶体结构,而蛋白质晶体结构本身往往并非没有错误。解释的缺陷包括部分或错误的Zn位点,错配的错配子,忽略了晶体的对称性和配体等。总之,我们警告不要使用这种和类似的荟萃分析来忽略化学和晶体学知识,并强调保护重要性针对不良苹果的结构数据库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号