首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Why Do You Believe in God? Relationships between Religious Belief Analytic Thinking Mentalizing and Moral Concern
【2h】

Why Do You Believe in God? Relationships between Religious Belief Analytic Thinking Mentalizing and Moral Concern

机译:你为什么相信上帝?宗教信仰分析思维心理和道德关怀之间的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prior work has established that analytic thinking is associated with disbelief in God, whereas religious and spiritual beliefs have been positively linked to social and emotional cognition. However, social and emotional cognition can be subdivided into a number of distinct dimensions, and some work suggests that analytic thinking is in tension with some aspects of social-emotional cognition. This leaves open two questions. First, is belief linked to social and emotional cognition in general, or a specific dimension in particular? Second, does the negative relationship between belief and analytic thinking still hold after relationships with social and emotional cognition are taken into account? We report eight hypothesis-driven studies which examine these questions. These studies are guided by a theoretical model which focuses on the distinct social and emotional processing deficits associated with autism spectrum disorders (mentalizing) and psychopathy (moral concern). To our knowledge no other study has investigated both of these dimensions of social and emotion cognition alongside analytic thinking. We find that religious belief is robustly positively associated with moral concern (4 measures), and that at least part of the negative association between belief and analytic thinking (2 measures) can be explained by a negative correlation between moral concern and analytic thinking. Using nine different measures of mentalizing, we found no evidence of a relationship between mentalizing and religious or spiritual belief. These findings challenge the theoretical view that religious and spiritual beliefs are linked to the perception of agency, and suggest that gender differences in religious belief can be explained by differences in moral concern. These findings are consistent with the opposing domains hypothesis, according to which brain areas associated with moral concern and analytic thinking are in tension.
机译:先前的工作表明,分析性思维与对上帝的怀疑有关,而宗教和精神信仰与社会和情感认知之间存在正向联系。但是,社交和情感认知可以细分为许多不同的维度,并且一些工作表明分析思维与社交情感认知的某些方面存在着张力。这留下了两个问题。首先,信仰是与社会或情感认知总体上相关,还是与特定维度相关?其次,在考虑了与社会和情感认知的关系之后,信念和分析思维之间的消极关系是否仍然存在?我们报告了八项假设驱动的研究,它们研究了这些问题。这些研究由一个理论模型指导,该模型关注与自闭症谱系障碍(精神病)和精神病(道德问题)相关的明显的社会和情感加工缺陷。据我们所知,没有其他研究对社会和情感认知的这两个方面以及分析性思维进行了研究。我们发现,宗教信仰与道德关注(4项措施)密切相关,并且至少一部分信仰与分析思维之间的负面联系(2项措施)可以通过道德关注与分析性思维之间的负相关关系来解释。通过九种不同的心理测度方法,我们没有发现心理与宗教或精神信仰之间存在联系的证据。这些发现挑战了宗教和精神信仰与代理感知相关的理论观点,并表明宗教信仰中的性别差异可以用道德关注的差异来解释。这些发现与相反领域的假设相一致,根据这一假设,与道德关注和分析思维相关的大脑区域处于紧张状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号