首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Effects of Experimentally Manipulated Social Status on Acute Eating Behavior: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study
【2h】

The Effects of Experimentally Manipulated Social Status on Acute Eating Behavior: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study

机译:实验控制的社会地位对急性进食行为的影响:一项随机交叉试验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Both subjective and objectively measured social status has been associated with multiple health outcomes, including weight status, but the mechanism for this relationship remains unclear. Experimental studies may help identify the causal mechanisms underlying low social standing as a pathway for obesity. Our objective was to investigate the effects of experimentally manipulated social status on ad libitum acute dietary intakes and stress-related outcomes as potential mechanisms relating social status and weight. This was a pilot feasibility, randomized, crossover study in Hispanic young adults (n=9; age 19–25; 67% female; BMI ≥18.5 and ≤30 kg/m2). At visit 1, participants consumed a standardized breakfast and were randomized to a high social status position (HIGH) or low social status position (LOW) in a rigged game of Monopoly™. The rules for the game differed substantially in terms of degree of ‘privilege’ depending on randomization to HIGH or LOW. Following Monopoly™, participants were given an ad libitum buffet meal and energy intakes (kcal) were estimated by pre- and post-weighing foods consumed. Stress-related markers were measured at baseline, after the game of Monopoly™, and after lunch. Visit 2 used the same standardized protocol; however, participants were exposed to the opposite social status condition. When compared to HIGH, participants in LOW consumed 130 more calories (p=0.07) and a significantly higher proportion of their daily calorie needs in the ad libitum buffet meal (39% in LOW versus 31% in HIGH; p=0.04). In LOW, participants reported decreased feelings of pride and powerfulness following Monopoly™ (p=0.05) and after their lunch meal (p=0.08). Relative to HIGH, participants in LOW demonstrated higher heart rates following Monopoly™ (p=0.06), but this relationship was not significant once lunch was consumed (p=0.31). Our pilot data suggest a possible causal relationship between experimentally manipulated low social status and increased acute energy intakes in Hispanic young adults, potentially influenced by decreased feelings of pride and powerfulness. Increased energy intake over time, resulting in positive energy balance, could contribute to increased risk for obesity, which could partially explain the observed relationship between low social standing and higher weight. Larger and longitudinal studies in a diverse sample need to be conducted to confirm findings, increase generalizability, and assess whether this relationship persists over time.
机译:主观和客观测量的社会状况都与多种健康结局相关,包括体重状况,但这种关系的机制仍不清楚。实验研究可能有助于确定低社会地位作为肥胖途径的原因机制。我们的目的是研究实验控制的社会地位对随意摄入急性饮食摄入和与压力相关的结果的影响,这是与社会地位和体重相关的潜在机制。这是一项针对西班牙裔年轻人(n = 9; 19-25岁;女性67%; BMI≥18.5和≤30kg / m 2 )的可行性试验性随机交叉试验。在第1次访问中,参与者食用了标准早餐,并在操纵的Monopoly™游戏中被随机分配到较高的社会地位(HIGH)或较低的社会地位(LOW)。根据“特权”的程度,游戏的规则有很大不同,具体取决于随机化为“高”或“低”。 Monopoly™之后,参与者可以自由享用自助餐,并通过称重前后所消耗的食物估算能量摄入(千卡)。在基线,Monopoly™游戏结束后和午餐后测量与压力相关的标记。访问2使用相同的标准化协议;但是,参与者面临相反的社会地位条件。与“高”相比,“低”参与者在任意自助餐中多消耗了130卡路里(p = 0.07),并且其日常卡路里需求的比例也显着增加(“低”为39%,而“高”为31%; p = 0.04)。在LOW中,参与者报告在Monopoly™之后(p = 0.05)和午餐后(p = 0.08),自尊心和力量感降低。相对于HIGH,在Monopoly™之后,LOW的参与者表现出较高的心率(p = 0.06),但是一旦吃完午餐,这种关系就不明显了(p = 0.31)。我们的试验数据表明,实验操纵的低社会地位与西班牙裔年轻成年人增加的急性能量摄入量之间可能存在因果关系,这可能是由于自尊心和力量感降低所致。随着时间的流逝摄入更多的能量,导致积极的能量平衡,可能会增加肥胖的风险,这可以部分解释观察到的社会地位低下与体重增加之间的关系。需要在不同的样本中进行较大规模和纵向的研究,以确认发现,提高普遍性并评估这种关系是否会随着时间而持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号